Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Aug;28(4):1129-1135.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02989-y. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

Parastomal hernia prevention with an intraperitoneal prophylactic 3D-funnel mesh: review of the technique and middle-term results

Affiliations
Observational Study

Parastomal hernia prevention with an intraperitoneal prophylactic 3D-funnel mesh: review of the technique and middle-term results

Jesus Badia-Closa et al. Hernia. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Parastomal hernia (PH) stands out as a prevalent complication following end colostomies, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Various surgical strategies, predominantly involving prophylactic mesh deployment, have been explored with variable outcomes. This study details our experience and mid-term outcomes utilizing a funnel-shaped mesh.

Methods: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, observational study examined consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery with end colostomy, incorporating a 3D-funnel mesh from January 2019 to December 2021 (PM group). A historical cohort of patients with end colostomy without prophylactic mesh served as the comparison (C group). Postoperative morbidity within 30 days was documented, and clinical examinations and radiological tests were employed for parastomal hernia diagnosis during follow-up.

Results: Seventy-two patients participated, with thirty-four in the PM group and thirty-eight in the C group. The PM group experienced 16 postoperative complications, unrelated to the mesh, while the C group recorded 20 complications (p = 0.672). Median follow-up was 22.06 months for the PM group and 63.18 months for the C group. The PM group exhibited a lower parastomal hernia incidence during follow-up (8.8%) compared to the C group(68.4%) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Prophylactic use of a 3D-funnel mesh appears effective in reducing parastomal hernia incidence in the short and mid-term, without an associated increase in postoperative morbidity.

Keywords: colostomy; mesh; parastomal hernia; prevention; prophylactic; wall surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM et al (2018) European hernia society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia 22:183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1697-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Temple B, Farley T, Popik K et al (2016) Prevalence of parastomal hernia and factors associated with its development. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 43:489–493. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000261 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berger D (2008) Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST®). Hernia 12:243–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0318-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tadeo-Ruiz G, Picazo-Yeste J-S, Moreno-Sanz C, Herrero-Bogajo M-L (2010) Eventración paraestomal: antecedentes, estado actual y expectativas de futuro. Cir Esp 87:339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2009.11.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. López-Cano M, Pereira JA, Rodrigues-Gonçalves V et al (2021) Parestomal hernia repair. prospective observational study based on the spanish registry of incisional hernia (EVEREG). Cirugía Española (English Edition) 99:527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2021.06.016 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources