Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 13:11:23743735241237684.
doi: 10.1177/23743735241237684. eCollection 2024.

"There was No Opportunity to Express Good or Bad": Perspectives From Patient Focus Groups on Patient Experience in Clinical Trials

Affiliations

"There was No Opportunity to Express Good or Bad": Perspectives From Patient Focus Groups on Patient Experience in Clinical Trials

Patrick Boyd et al. J Patient Exp. .

Abstract

To understand how patients perceive their experiences leading up to, during, and after a clinical trial, and the relationship these experiences had with future willingness to participate, we conducted 3 focus groups with patients who had prior clinical trial involvement (n = 25). Discussion topics included clinical trial discovery, enrollment, communication, trust, patient-centricity, and future enrollment. Patient focus groups revealed a variety of motivations for enrolling in clinical trials (eg, altruism, efficacious treatment, curiosity, desperation, etc.). Patients learned about clinical trials through trusted sources (eg, primary care physicians, patient advocacy groups) and social media. Access and uncertainty about clinical trials were barriers to enrollment. Patient-centric communication and attention given to disease states and symptom severity were valued and made patients feel genuinely cared about. Post-trial follow up and being informed of trial results were inconsistently reported by patients. Critically, patients described frustration with an overall lack of patient experience measurement. Patients identified a need to measure experiences before, during, and after clinical trials and emphasized that doing so would facilitate patient trust and overall experience.

Keywords: clinician-patient relationship; communication; patient feedback; patient satisfaction; trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Mechanic D, Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients’ trust in medical care and their physicians. JAMA. 1996;275(21):1693‐7. https://doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530450083048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hudson KL, Lauer MS, Collins FS. Toward a new era of trust and transparency in clinical trials. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1353‐4. https://doi:10.1001/jama.2016.14668 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yessis JL, Kost RG, Lee LM, et al. Development of a research participants’ perception survey to improve clinical research. Clin Transl Sci. 2012;5(6):452‐60. 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00443.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris Y, Gorelick PB, Samuels P, et al. Why African Americans may not be participating in clinical trials. J Natl Med Assoc. 1996;88(10):630‐4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berrigan D, Dean D, Senft EN, et al. Uncertainty: a neglected determinant of health behavior? Front Psychol. 2023;14(14):1145879. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145879 - DOI - PMC - PubMed