Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 15:10:e50743.
doi: 10.2196/50743.

Estimation of the Population Size of Street- and Venue-Based Female Sex Workers and Sexually Exploited Minors in Rwanda in 2022: 3-Source Capture-Recapture

Affiliations

Estimation of the Population Size of Street- and Venue-Based Female Sex Workers and Sexually Exploited Minors in Rwanda in 2022: 3-Source Capture-Recapture

Elysee Tuyishime et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: HIV surveillance among key populations is a priority in all epidemic settings. Female sex workers (FSWs) globally as well as in Rwanda are disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic; hence, the Rwanda HIV and AIDS National Strategic Plan (2018-2024) has adopted regular surveillance of population size estimation (PSE) of FSWs every 2-3 years.

Objective: We aimed at estimating, for the fourth time, the population size of street- and venue-based FSWs and sexually exploited minors aged ≥15 years in Rwanda.

Methods: In August 2022, the 3-source capture-recapture method was used to estimate the population size of FSWs and sexually exploited minors in Rwanda. The field work took 3 weeks to complete, with each capture occasion lasting for a week. The sample size for each capture was calculated using shinyrecap with inputs drawn from previously conducted estimation exercises. In each capture round, a stratified multistage sampling process was used, with administrative provinces as strata and FSW hotspots as the primary sampling unit. Different unique objects were distributed to FSWs in each capture round; acceptance of the unique object was marked as successful capture. Sampled FSWs for the subsequent capture occasions were asked if they had received the previously distributed unique object in order to determine recaptures. Statistical analysis was performed in R (version 4.0.5), and Bayesian Model Averaging was performed to produce the final PSE with a 95% credibility set (CS).

Results: We sampled 1766, 1848, and 1865 FSWs and sexually exploited minors in each capture round. There were 169 recaptures strictly between captures 1 and 2, 210 recaptures exclusively between captures 2 and 3, and 65 recaptures between captures 1 and 3 only. In all 3 captures, 61 FSWs were captured. The median PSE of street- and venue-based FSWs and sexually exploited minors in Rwanda was 37,647 (95% CS 31,873-43,354), corresponding to 1.1% (95% CI 0.9%-1.3%) of the total adult females in the general population. Relative to the adult females in the general population, the western and northern provinces ranked first and second with a higher concentration of FSWs, respectively. The cities of Kigali and eastern province ranked third and fourth, respectively. The southern province was identified as having a low concentration of FSWs.

Conclusions: We provide, for the first time, both the national and provincial level population size estimate of street- and venue-based FSWs in Rwanda. Compared with the previous 2 rounds of FSW PSEs at the national level, we observed differences in the street- and venue-based FSW population size in Rwanda. Our study might not have considered FSWs who do not want anyone to know they are FSWs due to several reasons, leading to a possible underestimation of the true PSE.

Keywords: 3-source; AIDS; HIV; Rwanda; STD; capture-recapture; children; epidemiology; female sex workers; minor; population; population size; prevention; sexually exploited minor; sexually transmitted disease; surveillance; young adult.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Maps of individual captures highlighting the venue street hotspots visited in Rwanda in 2022. Map A: capture 1. Map B: capture 2. Map C: capture 3. Map D: All 3 captures combined. DRC: Democratic Republic of the Congo; FSW: female sex worker; PSE: population size estimation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Venn diagram presenting the national aggregated data of capture history results for single, double, and triple captures in Rwanda in 2022.

References

    1. Shubber Z, Mishra S, Vesga JF, Boily M. The HIV modes of transmission model: a systematic review of its findings and adherence to guidelines. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2014 Jun 23;17(1):18928. doi: 10.7448/ias.17.1.18928. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. UNAIDS. [2024-02-27]. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet .
    1. Full report — in danger: UNAIDS global AIDS update 2022. UNAIDS. [2024-02-20]. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2022/in-danger-global-aids... .
    1. UNAIDS data 2021. UNAIDS. [2024-02-20]. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2021/2021_unaids_data .
    1. Nsanzimana S, Mills EJ, Harari O, Mugwaneza P, Karita E, Uwizihiwe JP, Park JJ, Dron L, Condo J, Bucher H, Thorlund K. Prevalence and incidence of HIV among female sex workers and their clients: modelling the potential effects of intervention in Rwanda. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e002300. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002300. https://gh.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=32764126 bmjgh-2020-002300 - DOI - PMC - PubMed