Hemodynamic Impairments of Evaluating Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis using Quantitative Flow Ratio on Digital Subtraction Angiography : A Comparison with Computed Tomography Perfusion, MRI and Fractional Flow Reserve
- PMID: 38489035
- DOI: 10.1007/s00062-024-01395-2
Hemodynamic Impairments of Evaluating Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis using Quantitative Flow Ratio on Digital Subtraction Angiography : A Comparison with Computed Tomography Perfusion, MRI and Fractional Flow Reserve
Abstract
Purpose: Cerebral hemodynamics are important for the management of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). The quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel angiography-derived index for assessing the functional relevance of ICAS without pressure wires and adenosine. Good diagnostic yield with the hyperemic fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been reported, while data on the comparison of QFR to FFR are scarce.
Methods: In this prospective study 56 patients with anterior circulation symptomatic ICAS who received endovascular treatment were included. The new method of computing QFR from a single angiographic view, i.e., the Murray law-based QFR (μQFR), was applied to the examined vessels. An artificial intelligence algorithm was developed to realize the automatic delineation of vascular contour. Pressure gradients were measured before and after treatment within the lesion vessel using a pressure guidewire and the FFR was calculated.
Results: There was a good correlation between μQFR and FFR. Preoperative FFR predicted DWI watershed infarction (FFR optimal cut-off level: 0.755). Preoperative μQFR predicted DWI watershed infarction (μQFR optimal cut-off level: 0.51). Preoperative FFR predicted CTP hypoperfusion (FFR best predictive value: 0.62). Preoperative μQFR predicted CTP hypoperfusion (μQFR best predictive value: 0.375).
Conclusion: The μQFR based on DSA images can be used as an indicator to assess the functional status of the lesion in patients with ICAS.
Keywords: Cerebral hemodynamics; Digital dubtraction angiography; Fractional flow reserve; Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis; Quantitative flow ratio.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
Similar articles
-
Cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic anterior circulation intracranial stenosis measured by angiography-based quantitative flow ratio: association with CT perfusion.Eur Radiol. 2023 Aug;33(8):5687-5697. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09557-5. Epub 2023 Apr 6. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37022438
-
Comparison of coronary CT angiography-based and invasive coronary angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary stenosis: A multicenter retrospective analysis.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022 Nov-Dec;16(6):509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jun 30. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022. PMID: 35811245
-
Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97 Suppl 2:1040-1047. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29592. Epub 2021 Mar 4. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. PMID: 33660921
-
Intracranial atherosclerosis: From anatomy to pathophysiology.Int J Stroke. 2017 Apr;12(3):236-245. doi: 10.1177/1747493016685716. Epub 2017 Jan 9. Int J Stroke. 2017. PMID: 28067615 Review.
-
Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.Am J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;116(9):1469-78. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.078. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Am J Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26347004 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Integrating hemodynamic analysis with traditional imaging in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: current status and future perspectives.Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 18;16:1589162. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1589162. eCollection 2025. Front Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40757026 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Panvascular concept in the evaluation and treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Front Neurol. 2024 Dec 24;15:1460124. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1460124. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2024. PMID: 39777318 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Gorelick PB, Wong KS, Bae HJ, Pandey DK. Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: a large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier. Stroke. 2008 ;39(8):2396–9. CrossRef Medline
-
- Wong LK. Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke. 2006 ;1(3):158–9. CrossRef Medline
-
- Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, Soo YO, Pu Y, Pan Y, Wang Y, Zou X, Leung TW, Cai Y, Bai Q, Wu Y, Wang C, Pan X, Luo B, Wong KS; CICAS Study Group. Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study. Stroke. 2014 ;45(3):663–9. CrossRef Medline
-
- Kim SJ, Morales JM, Yaghi S, Honda T, Scalzo F, Hinman JD, Raychev R, Sharma LK, Feldmann E, Romano JG, Prabhakaran S, Liebeskind DS. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease mechanistic subtypes drive hypoperfusion patterns. J Neuroimaging. 2021;31(4):686–90. - PubMed
-
- Wabnitz AM, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella DJ, Lynn MJ, Cotsonis GA, Liebeskind DS, Waters MF, Lutsep H, López-Cancio E, Turan TN, Montgomery J, Janis LS, Lane B, Chimowitz MI, SAMMPRIS Investigators. Hemodynamic Markers in the Anterior Circulation as Predictors of Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Intracranial Stenosis. Stroke.. 50(1). 2019. pp. 143–7.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources