Offloading systems for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome
- PMID: 38489054
- DOI: 10.1007/s00592-024-02262-9
Offloading systems for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome
Abstract
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of commonly used offloading devices for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus. This meta-analysis (MA) has been performed for giving an answer to clinical questions on this topic of the Italian guideline on diabetic foot syndrome.
Methods: The present MA includes randomized controlled studies (duration > 12 weeks) comparing, in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-infected neuropathic foot ulcer: any offloading device vs either no offloading device or conventional footwear; removable versus non-removable offloading devices; surgical procedure vs other offloading approaches. The primary endpoint was ulcer healing.
Results: A total of 184 studies were identified, and 18 were considered eligible for the analysis. We found that: any plantar off-loading, when compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing (MH-OR: 3.13 [1.08, 9.11], p = 0.04, I2 = 0%); total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, had a higher ulcer healing rate (MH-OR: 2.64 [1.43, 4.89], p = 0.002, I2 = 51%); surgical offloading for active ulcers in combination with post-surgery offloading achieves higher ulcer healing rate when compared to offloading devices alone (MH-OR: 6.77 [1.64, 27.93], p = 0.008, I2 = 0%).
Conclusions: Any plantar offloading, compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing rate. Total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, is preferable. Surgical offloading for active ulcers, in combination with post-surgery offloading devices, achieves a higher ulcer healing rate when compared to other offloading devices alone. Further studies with a larger cohort of patients with diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers and extended follow-up periods are necessary.
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Neuropathic foot ulcer; Offloading.
© 2024. Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of offloading interventions to heal foot ulcers in persons with diabetes: a systematic review.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e3275. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3275. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020. PMID: 32176438 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of offloading interventions for people with diabetes-related foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3650. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3650. Epub 2023 Jun 8. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 37292021
-
The effectiveness of footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers and reduce plantar pressure in diabetes: a systematic review.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008 May-Jun;24 Suppl 1:S162-80. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.850. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008. PMID: 18442178
-
Fibreglass Total Contact Casting, Removable Cast Walkers, and Irremovable Cast Walkers to Treat Diabetic Neuropathic Foot Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 Sep 21;17(12):1-124. eCollection 2017. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017. PMID: 28989556 Free PMC article.
-
Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update).Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3647. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3647. Epub 2023 May 25. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 37226568
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of a bio-absorbable antibiotic delivery in calcium sulphate granules for the treatment of osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot: A randomized, double blinded, controlled clinical study The BIG D-FOOT study.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 May;27(5):2552-2560. doi: 10.1111/dom.16254. Epub 2025 Feb 19. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025. PMID: 39972526 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- International working group on the diabetic foot (2023) Guidelines (2023 update) https://iwgdfguidelines.org/guidelines-2023/ Accessed on 24 September 2023
-
- Lazzarini PA, Raspovic KM, Meloni M, van Netten JJ (2023) A new declaration for feet’s sake: halving the global diabetic foot disease burden from 2% to 1% with next generation care. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 24:e3747. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3747 - DOI
-
- Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA (2017) Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med 376(24):2367–2375. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1615439 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Armstrong DG, Tan TW, Boulton AJM, Bus SA (2023) Diabetic foot ulcers: a review. JAMA 330(1):62–75. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.10578 - DOI - PubMed
-
- International diabetes federation reports (2022) Diabetes foot-related complications. https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/diabetic-foot-2022/ Accessed 2 February 2024
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous