Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar 15;8(1):e002472.
doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002472.

Global relevance of MGRS growth standards: the case of India

Vandana Prasad  1 , Dipa Sinha  2 , Rohit James Joseph  3
Affiliations
Review

Global relevance of MGRS growth standards: the case of India

Vandana Prasad et al. BMJ Paediatr Open. .

Abstract

The most common measures of childhood undernutrition are based on anthropometric measures such as height-for-age (stunting/chronic undernutrition) and weight-for-height (wasting/acute undernutrition). It is well recognised that the determinants of undernutrition are multiple, including food intake, dietary diversity, health, sanitation and women's status. Currently, most countries across the world including India use the globally accepted WHO-Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS) growth standards (2006) for the purposes of measurement as well as for evaluating progress on these metrics. However, there is some discussion on the universal relevance of these standards, and in the Indian context, whether these standards overestimate the prevalence of stunting, considering differences in genetic potential for growth. This is especially relevant in the context of increasing burden of obesity and non-communicable diseases in India. Based on a detailed review of literature, policy documents and expert inputs, this review paper discusses the relevance of the WHO growth standards for height/stunting, in the context of India. Issues discussed related to the MGRS methodology include pooling of data and intersite and intrasite variability, opting for standards as opposed to references, and external validity. Other issues related to plasticity of stunting and the influence of maternal heights are also discussed, in the context of analysing the appropriateness of using universal growth standards. Based on the review, it is recommended that the current standards may continue to be used until a newer global standard is established through a similar study.

Keywords: Genetics; Growth; Infant; Obesity; Statistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in child stunting rates, in select developing countries. Source: Authors’ calculations based on DHS, MICS and national survey data, where available.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trends in child stunting rates, in select Indian states. Source: Authors’ calculations based on NFHS data (Rounds 3,4, and 5).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Onis M, Onyango A, Borghi E, et al. . Worldwide implementation of the WHO child growth standards. Public Health Nutr 2012;15:1603–10. 10.1017/S136898001200105X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cole TJ. The development of growth references and growth charts. Ann Hum Biol 2012;39:382–94. 10.3109/03014460.2012.694475 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, et al. . WHO child growth standards. Acta Paediatr 2006;95:1–104.
    1. Perera PJ, Fernanado MP, Ranathunga N, et al. . Growth parameters of Sri Lankan children during infancy: A comparison with World Health Organization Multicentre growth reference study. J Hum Growth Dev 2014;24:11. 10.7322/jhgd.71331 - DOI
    1. Grummer-Strawn LM, Reinold C, Krebs NF, et al. . Use of world health organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0-59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59:1–15. - PubMed