Models predicting mortality risk of patients with burns to ≥ 50% of the total body surface
- PMID: 38490836
- DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.02.031
Models predicting mortality risk of patients with burns to ≥ 50% of the total body surface
Abstract
Background: Several models predicting mortality risk of burn patients have been proposed. However, models that consider all such patients may not well predict the mortality of patients with extensive burns.
Method: This retrospective multicentre study recruited patients with extensive burns (≥ 50% of the total body surface area [TBSA]) treated in three hospitals of Eastern China from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2022. The performances of six predictive models were assessed by drawing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves. Potential predictors were sought via "least absolute shrinkage and selection operator" regression. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to construct a predictive model for patients with burns to ≥ 50% of the TBSA. A nomogram was prepared and the performance thereof assessed by reference to the ROC, calibration, and decision curves.
Result: A total of 465 eligible patients with burns to ≥ 50% TBSA were included, of whom 139 (29.9%) died. The FLAMES model exhibited the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) (0.875), followed by the models of Zhou et al. (0.853) and the ABSI model (0.802). The calibration curve of the Zhou et al. model fitted well; those of the other models significantly overestimated the mortality risk. The new nomogram includes four variables: age, the %TBSA burned, the area of full-thickness burns, and blood lactate. The AUCs (training set 0.889; internal validation set 0.934; external validation set 0.890) and calibration curves showed that the nomogram exhibited an excellent discriminative capacity and that the predictions were very accurate.
Conclusion: For patients with burns to ≥ 50%of the TBSA, the Zhou et al. and FLAMES models demonstrate relatively high predictive ability for mortality. The new nomogram is sensitive, specific, and accurate, and will aid rapid clinical decision-making.
Keywords: Extensive burns; Mortality; Multicentre; Nomogram.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Burns Injuries. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Inclusion of coexisting morbidity in a TBSA% and age based model for the prediction of mortality after burns does not increase its predictive power.Burns. 2015 Dec;41(8):1868-1876. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Oct 21. Burns. 2015. PMID: 26507519
-
[Establishment of nomogram predicting model for the death risk of extremely severe burn patients and the predictive value].Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 20;36(9):845-852. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190620-00280. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32972070 Chinese.
-
Developing a burn injury severity score (BISS): adding age and total body surface area burned to the injury severity score (ISS) improves mortality concordance.Burns. 2014 Aug;40(5):805-13. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Dec 4. Burns. 2014. PMID: 24315362
-
[Establishment of a prognostic nomogram model for predicting acute renal injury in patients with moderate and severe burns].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):736-740. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220616-00577. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023. PMID: 37545452 Chinese.
-
Nomogram based on burn characteristics and the National Early Warning Score to predict survival in severely burned patients.Burns. 2025 Feb;51(1):107285. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Burns. 2025. PMID: 39644812
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical