Effect of Exercise Training on Prognosis in Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 38491965
- PMCID: PMC11175663
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae147
Effect of Exercise Training on Prognosis in Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of standard care (SoC) combined with supervised in-bed cycling (Bed-Cycle) or booklet exercises (Book-Exe) versus SoC in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 186 patients with CAP were assigned to SoC (n = 62), Bed-Cycle (n = 61), or Book-Exe (n = 63). Primary outcome length of stay (LOS) was analyzed with analysis of covariance. Secondary outcomes, 90-day readmission, and 180-day mortality were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard regression and readmission days with negative-binominal regression.
Results: LOS was -2% (95% CI: -24 to 25) and -1% (95% CI: -22 to 27) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe, compared with SoC. Ninety-day readmission was 35.6% for SoC, 27.6% for Bed-Cycle, and 21.3% for Book-Exe. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for 90-day readmission was 0.63 (95% CI: .33-1.21) and 0.54 (95% CI: .27-1.08) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe compared with SoC. aHR for 90-day readmission for combined exercise was 0.59 (95% CI: .33-1.03) compared with SoC. aHR for 180-day mortality was 0.84 (95% CI: .27-2.60) and 0.82 (95% CI: .26-2.55) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe compared with SoC. Number of readmission days was 226 for SoC, 161 for Bed-Cycle, and 179 for Book-Exe. Incidence rate ratio for readmission days was 0.73 (95% CI: .48-1.10) and 0.77 (95% CI: .51-1.15) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe compared with SoC.
Conclusions: Although supervised exercise training during admission with CAP did not reduce LOS or mortality, this trial suggests its potential to reduce readmission risk and number of readmission days.
Clinical trials registration: NCT04094636.
Keywords: admission; community-acquired pneumonia; exercise training; length of stay; readmission.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
