Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Sep 1;120(1):111-119.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.013. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Analysis of Alliance A021501: Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX or mFOLFIRINOX Plus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Analysis of Alliance A021501: Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX or mFOLFIRINOX Plus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Leila T Tchelebi et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: Alliance A021501 is the first randomized trial to evaluate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this post hoc study, we reviewed the quality of radiation therapy (RT) delivered.

Methods and materials: SBRT (6.6 Gy × 5) was intended but hypofractionated RT (5 Gy × 5) was permitted if SBRT specifications could not be met. Institutional credentialing through the National Cancer Institute-funded Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) was required. Rigorous RT quality assurance (RT QA) was mandated, including pretreatment review by a radiation oncologist. Revisions were required for unacceptable deviations. Additionally, we performed a post hoc RT QA analysis in which contours and plans were reviewed by 3 radiation oncologists and assigned a score (1, 2, or 3) based on adequacy. A score of 1 indicated no deviation, 2 indicated minor deviation, and 3 indicated a major deviation that could be clinically significant. Clinical outcomes were compared by treatment modality and by case score.

Results: Forty patients were registered to receive RT (1 planned but not treated) at 27 centers (18 academic and 9 community). Twenty-three centers were appropriately credentialed for moving lung/liver targets and 4 for static head and neck only. Thirty-two of 39 patients (82.1%) were treated with SBRT and 7 (17.9%) with hypofractionated RT. Five cases (13%) required revision before treatment. On post hoc review, 23 patients (59.0%) were noted to have suboptimal contours or plan coverage, 12 (30.8%) were scored a 2, and 11 (28.2%) were scored a 3. There were no apparent differences in failure patterns or surgical outcomes based on treatment technique or post hoc case score. Details related to on-treatment imaging were not recorded.

Conclusions: Despite rigorous QA, we encountered variability in simulation, contouring, plan coverage, and dose on trial. Although clinical outcomes did not appear to have been affected, findings from this analysis serve to inform subsequent PDAC SBRT trial designs and QA requirements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MC has received grant funding from ViewRay and StrataPharma (to institution), consulting fees from ViewRay, payment/honoraria from ViewRay, University of Toronto, IBA, and Sirtex, and travel support from ViewRay; he participates on an advisory board for ViewRay, and serves on the Board of Directors of the Proton Collaborative Group. KS received funding for the current project through Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) grant. EO received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, BioNTech, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, AstraZeneca, BioSapien, Astellas, Thetis, Autem, Neogene, BMS, Tempus, Fibrogen, Merus, Agios (spouse), Genentech-Roche (spouse), Eisai (spouse) and research finding to her institution from Genentech/Roche, BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Arcus, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hoosier Cancer Research Network, Kronos Bio, and Mirati Therapeutics Inc; Honorarium/speaker role from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (to myself), research funds from Celgene/BMS, Roche/Genentech, Janssen, Novartis (to institution). JM is on the advisory board and has received consulting fees from Merck Pharmaceutical. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose. JH received grant funding from the Canopy Cancer Collective (institution), royalties from Springer for a textbook (self), consulting fees from Histosonics and Boston Scientific (self), and has stock in Histosonics.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Alliance A021501 Trial Schema Abbreviations: BLR, borderline resectable; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; IROC, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core; FOLFIRINOX, leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin; RT, radiation therapy
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Example of each case score for target contours. Panel 2A depicts a case scored as 1 due to appropriate inclusion of the SMV within the tumor-vessel interface contour. Panel 2B depicts a case scored as 2 due to partial omission of the SMV posteriorly. Panel 2C depicts a case scored as 3 due to exclusion of the SMA from the TVI despite abutment of the SMA by gross disease. Blue contour: PTV 36 Gy (iTVI plus 3mm); Green contour: 33 Gy PTV (25 Gy PTV minus the PRVgi); Yellow contour: 25 Gy PTV [(iGTV + iTVI) plus 3mm]. Abbreviations: iGTV, gross target volume accounting for motion; SMV, superior mesenteric vein; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; iTVI, tumor-vessel interface accounting for motion; PTV, planning target volume; PRVgi, gastrointestinal planning risk volume.

References

    1. Ghaneh P, Palmer D, Cicconi S, et al. Immediate surgery compared with short-course neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus capecitabine, FOLFIRINOX, or chemoradiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (ESPAC5): a four-arm, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00348-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jang JY, Han Y, Lee H, et al. Oncological Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Gemcitabine Versus Upfront Surgery in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 2/3 Trial. Ann Surg. Aug 2018;268(2):215–222. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002705 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Versteijne E, van Dam JL, Suker M, et al. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Dutch Randomized PREOPANC Trial. J Clin Oncol. Jan 27 2022:Jco2102233. doi: 10.1200/jco.21.02233 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrams RA, Winter KA, Regine WF, et al. Failure to Adhere to Protocol Specified Radiation Therapy Guidelines Was Associated With Decreased Survival in RTOG 9704—A Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Resected Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2012/02/01/ 2012;82(2):809–816. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohri N, Shen X, Dicker AP, Doyle LA, Harrison AS, Showalter TN. Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(6):387–393. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms