Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar 1;21(1-3):52-60.
eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.

Ensuring Stakeholder Feedback in the Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials for Rare Diseases: ISCTM Position Paper of the Orphan Disease Working Group

Affiliations
Review

Ensuring Stakeholder Feedback in the Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials for Rare Diseases: ISCTM Position Paper of the Orphan Disease Working Group

Gahan J Pandina et al. Innov Clin Neurosci. .

Abstract

The 1983 Orphan Drug Act in the United States (US) changed the landscape for development of therapeutics for rare or orphan diseases, which collectively affect approximately 300 million people worldwide, half of whom are children. The act has undoubtedly accelerated drug development for orphan diseases, with over 6,400 orphan drug applications submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 1983 to 2023, including 350 drugs approved for over 420 indications. Drug development in this population is a global and collaborative endeavor. This position paper of the International Society for Central Nervous System Clinical Trials and Methodology (ISCTM) describes some potential best practices for the involvement of key stakeholder feedback in the drug development process. Stakeholders include advocacy groups, patients and caregivers with lived experience, public and private research institutions (including academia and pharmaceutical companies), treating clinicians, and funders (including the government and independent foundations). The authors articulate the challenges of drug development in orphan diseases and propose methods to address them. Challenges range from the poor understanding of disease history to development of endpoints, targets, and clinical trials designs, to finding solutions to competing research priorities by involved parties.

Keywords: Orphan disease; clinical trials; drug development research; key stakeholders; patient experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURES: GJP is a full-time employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and a Johnson & Johnson stockholder. JB is a full time employee of Signant Health, and may own stock or equity in the company. LDH holds stock in Johnson & Johnson. JPH is a shareholder of AMO Pharma, Ltd. JCK holds stock in McKesson, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda. TAM is an employee and shareholder of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. MKS has received research support from Stanford’s Maternal Child Health Research Institute and Stanford’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Aging, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Johnson & Johnson, and the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation; is on a data safety monitoring board for a study funded by the National Institute of Mental Health; is on the advisory board for Sunovion and Skyland Trail; is a consultant for Johnson & Johnson, Alkermes, Neuroma, AbbVie, Karuna Therapeutics, Inc., Boehringer-Ingelheim, Intra-Cellular Therapeutics, Inc, and Alto Neuroscience; and receives honoraria from the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, royalties from American Psychiatric Association Publishing and Thrive Global, and travel support for continuing medical education from Neuroscience Education Institute and Psych Congress. SZD has provided services as consultant during the last two years to Medavante-Prophase and Sanofi. All other authors conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Example of possible data collection approaches during COVID-19 lockdown, and moving target outcomes for decentralized clinical trials (adapted from Aman and Pearson, 2020)

References

    1. Nguengang Wakap S, Lambert DM, Olry A et al. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28(2):165–173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazzucato M, Visonà Dalla Pozza L, Minichiello C et al. Estimating mortality in rare diseases using a population-based registry, 2002 through 2019. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18(1):362. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Groft SC, Posada M, Taruscio D. Progress, challenges and global approaches to rare diseases. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(10):2711–2716. - PubMed
    1. Mikami K, Sturdy S. Patient organization involvement and the challenge of securing access to treatments for rare diseases: report of a policy engagement workshop. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3:14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan AYL, Chan VKY, Olsson S et al. Access and unmet needs of orphan drugs in 194 countries and 6 areas: a global policy review with content analysis. Value Health. 2020;23(12):1580–1591. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources