Rurality is associated with lower likelihood of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor use for treatment intensification
- PMID: 38495952
- PMCID: PMC10940908
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100429
Rurality is associated with lower likelihood of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor use for treatment intensification
Abstract
Background: Antihyperglycemic drug utilization studies are conducted frequently and describe the uptake of new drug therapies across may jurisdictions. An increasingly important, yet often absent, aspect of these studies is the impact of rurality on drug utilization.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to explore the association between place of residence (rural, urban, metropolitan) and the use of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) for first treatment intensification of type 2 diabetes.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2019 of new metformin users. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between place of residence (using postal codes) and likelihood of DPP-4i dispensing.
Results: After adjusting for confounders, analysis revealed that rural-dwellers are less likely to have a DPP-4i dispensed, compared with metropolitan-dwellers (aOR:0.64; 95%CI:0.61-0.67) and over-time, the uptake in rural areas was slower.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that rurality can have an impact on drug therapy decisions at first treatment intensification, with respect to the utilization of new therapies.
Keywords: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor; Residence; Rural-urban continuum; Treatment intensification; Type 2 diabetes.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported. S.H.S. is supported as the Chair in Patient Health Management, jointly held by the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta. This study is based in part on data provided by Alberta Health. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Government of Alberta. Neither the Government of Alberta nor Alberta Health express any opinion in relation to this study.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Rural Residence Is Associated With a Delayed Trend Away From Sulfonylurea Use for Treatment Intensification of Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2023 Mar 1;46(3):613-619. doi: 10.2337/dc22-1223. Diabetes Care. 2023. PMID: 36637880
-
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes, without cardiovascular or renal disease.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240141. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33057387 Free PMC article.
-
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor use is associated with decreased risk of fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Sep;84(9):2029-2039. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13636. Epub 2018 Jun 29. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 29766544 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic literature review.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Jun;22(4):555-574. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2042255. Epub 2022 Feb 18. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022. PMID: 35152812
-
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors alleviate cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Lipids Health Dis. 2023 Dec 11;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12944-023-01985-y. Lipids Health Dis. 2023. PMID: 38082288 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluating methods to define place of residence in Canadian administrative data and the impact on observed associations with all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02531-3. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025. PMID: 40102777 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous