Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 14;16(2):e54189.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.54189. eCollection 2024 Feb.

A Qualitative Study Assessing the Management of Predatory Journals and Their Publishing Activities: Results From the ASGLOS Study

Affiliations

A Qualitative Study Assessing the Management of Predatory Journals and Their Publishing Activities: Results From the ASGLOS Study

Alessandro Martinino et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Predatory journals are an emerging problem in scientific literature, as they have financial motives without guaranteeing scientific quality. Therefore, the scientific community needs to establish how this issue can be solved in the long term. Objective The study aims to provide information that can be used to take action against predatory journals and to guide future change. Methods A Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, California, United States) survey was designed and disseminated between September 2021 and April 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis was used as a qualitative analysis technique in this study, with the assistance of the NVivo software (Lumivero LLC, Denver, Colorado, United States) to manage and support the analysis process. Results A total of 978 responses from 58 countries worldwide, achieving a response rate of 19.9%, were analyzed. Five key themes emerged regarding participants' suggestions on techniques to cope with the detrimental impact of predatory journals: "Checking," "Increasing education and awareness," "Responsibility," "Use of technology," and "Obstacles to the solution." Conclusion The outcomes of this study will help us focus and channel efforts in the future to combat predatory journals and aid us in understanding what needs to be done. We hope that this study will influence management strategies and encourage more education and awareness on a global scale.

Keywords: academic spam; electronic mail; predatory journal; survey; time management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Techniques to increase awareness of predatory journals

References

    1. Predatory journals and conferences: why fake counts. Cortegiani A, Manca A, Giarratano A. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020;33:192–197. - PubMed
    1. Rebranding of predatory journals and conferences: understanding its implication and prevention strategy. Martinino A, Chatterjee S, Smeenk FW, Pouwels S. Cureus. 2023;15:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Predatory journals in otorhinolaryngology [Article in German] Lüers JC, Jansen S, Klußmann JP. Laryngorhinootologie. 2023;102:111–117. - PubMed
    1. Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences. Bowman JD. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78:176. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spamming in scholarly publishing: a case study. Kozak M, Iefremova O, Hartley J. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67:2009–2015.

LinkOut - more resources