Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Mar 8:2024.03.05.582637.
doi: 10.1101/2024.03.05.582637.

Precision Enhancement of CAR-NK Cells through Non-Viral Engineering and Highly Multiplexed Base Editing

Affiliations

Precision Enhancement of CAR-NK Cells through Non-Viral Engineering and Highly Multiplexed Base Editing

Minjing Wang et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells' unique ability to kill transformed cells expressing stress ligands or lacking major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) has prompted their development for immunotherapy. However, NK cells have demonstrated only moderate responses against cancer in clinical trials and likely require advanced genome engineering to reach their full potential as a cancer therapeutic. Multiplex genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 base editors (BE) has been used to enhance T cell function and has already entered clinical trials but has not been reported in human NK cells. Here, we report the first application of BE in primary NK cells to achieve both loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. We observed highly efficient single and multiplex base editing, resulting in significantly enhanced NK cell function. Next, we combined multiplex BE with non-viral TcBuster transposon-based integration to generate IL-15 armored CD19 CAR-NK cells with significantly improved functionality in a highly suppressive model of Burkitt's lymphoma both in vitro and in vivo. The use of concomitant non-viral transposon engineering with multiplex base editing thus represents a highly versatile and efficient platform to generate CAR-NK products for cell-based immunotherapy and affords the flexibility to tailor multiple gene edits to maximize the effectiveness of the therapy for the cancer type being treated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement M.W., E.J.P., M.G.K., B.S.M. and B.R.W. have filed patents covering the methods and approaches outlined in this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Highly efficient single gene KO in NK cells using BE.
a Editing efficiency at genomic level quantified by A to G conversion of target base for each gene locus (n=3 independent NK cell donors). b Editing efficiency at protein level quantified by percentage of protein loss of each gene (n=3 independent NK cell donors). c Schema of killing assay to assess the functional improvement of AHR KO NK cells. d Ability of AHR KO versus Ctrl NK cells (with or without 14 days of L-Kynurenine pre-treatment) to kill K562 cells at various E:T ratios as measured by luciferase luminescence assay. Assays run in triplicate in n=2 independent biological NK cell donors. e Statistical significance (P-value) between each condition of AHR KO functional killing assay at E to T ratio of 1:2. f Schema of killing assay to assess the functional improvement of CISH KO NK cells. g Ability of CISH KO versus Ctrl NK cells to kill Molm-13 cells at various E:T ratios as measured by luciferase luminescence assay. Assays run in triplicate in n=3 independent biological NK cell donors. h Schema of killing assay to assess the functional improvement of TIGIT KO NK cells. i Ability of TIGIT KO versus Ctrl NK cells to kill Raji CD155hi cells at various E:T ratios as measured by luciferase luminescence assay. Assays run in triplicate in n=3 independent biological NK cell donors. j Schema of killing assay to assess the functional improvement of PDCD1 KO NK cells. k Ability of PDCD1 KO versus Ctrl NK cells to kill Raji PD-L1hi cells at various E:T ratios as measured by luciferase luminescence assay. Assays run in triplicate in n=3 independent biological NK cell donors. l Schema of ICS assay to assess the functional improvement of KLRG1 KO NK cells. m&n Cytokine production (m) and degranulation (n) ability of KLRG1 KO versus Ctrl NK cells against E-Cad+ Raji cells or E-Cad-Jurkat cells as measured by percentage of NK cells produce IFNγ and CD107a. Assays run in triplicate in n=3 independent biological NK cell donors. Data represented as mean ± SD. P-values calculated by two-way ANOVA test (n.s.P > 0.05, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Highly efficient gain-of-function mutation in NK cells using BE.
a Schema of how the S197P mutation renders NK cells non-cleavable by ADAM17 and results in enhanced ADCC cytotoxicity. b Schema of the recreation of S197P ncCD16a NK cells by a single base modification by BE. c Editing efficiency at genomic level quantified by A to G conversion of target base for CD16A (n=3 independent NK cell donors). d Editing efficiency at protein level quantified by CD16a retention on NK cell surface after PMA treatment (n=3 independent NK cell donors). e Cytokine production of S197P CD16a versus WT CD16a NK cells against CD20+ Raji cells during ADCC (E:T ratio: 1:1). Plotted by folds increase of each cytokine with versus without anti-hCD20 mAb co-treatment. Assays run in duplicate in n=3 independent biological NK cell donors. f Ability of S197P CD16a versus WT CD16a NK cells to carry out ADCC against anti-hCD20 mAb treated CD20+ Raji cells at various E:T ratios as measured by luciferase luminescence assay. Assays run in triplicate in n=3 independent biological NK cell donors. Data represented as mean ± SD. P-values calculated by two-way ANOVA test (*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Highly efficient multiplex editing in NK cells using BE.
a Schema of multiplex editing strategy. b Multiplex editing efficiency at genomic level quantified by A to G conversion of target base for each gene locus (n=2 independent NK cell donors). c Multiplex editing efficiency at protein level quantified by percentage of protein loss of each gene (n=2 independent NK cell donors). Data represented as mean ± SD.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Optimization of multiplex KO to maximize NK functionality against Rajihi/hi.
a Schema of optimization strategy and all possible KO combinations included. b Editing efficiency at genomic level quantified by A to G conversion of target base for each gene locus (n=3 independent NK cell donors). c Editing efficiency at protein level quantified by percentage of protein loss of each gene (n=3 independent NK cell donors). d Ability of each KO combination to kill Rajihi/hi cells at various E:T ratios as measured by luciferase luminescence assay. Assays run in triplicate in n=2 independent biological NK cell donors. e Functional killing assay statistical significance (P-value) between each KO combination at E to T ratio of 1:2 and 1:4. Ctrl: ABE8e mRNA only, TP: TIGIT and PDCD1 KO, TPA: TIGIT, PDCD1, and AHR KO, TPC: TIGIT, PDCD1, and CISH KO, TPAC: TIGIT, PDCD1, AHR, and CISH KO. Data represented as mean ± SD. P-values calculated by two-way ANOVA test.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Simultaneous BE and non-viral transposon engineering exhibited enhanced NK cytotoxicity.
a Schema of the designs of CD19 CAR constructs. b Schema of NK cell engineering timeline for simultaneous sgRNAs and CD19 CAR delivery. c Pre-sorting and post-sorting CAR integration rate quantified by percentage of RQR8 expression on NK cells (n=2 independent NK cell donors). d Post-sorting editing efficiency at genomic level quantified by A to G conversion of target base for each gene locus (n=2 independent NK cell donors). e Post-sorting editing efficiency at protein level quantified by percentage of protein loss of each gene (n=2 independent NK cell donors). f In vitro testing of the cytotoxicity of simultaneous BE and TcBuster engineered NK cells against Rajihi/hi cells at various E:T ratios as measured by luciferase luminescence assay. Assays run in triplicate in n=2 independent biological NK cell donors. g Killing assay statistical significance (P-value) between each condition at E to T ratio of 1:4. Ctrl: ABE8e mRNA and CAR-expressing nanoplasmid only, CAR: CD19 CAR RQR8; CAR15: CD19 CAR RQR8 IL-15; CTPKO: CISH, TIGIT, and PDCD1 KO; CAR/CTPKO: CD19 CAR RQR8 with CISH, TIGIT,, and PDCD1 KO; CAR15/CTPKO: CD19 CAR RQR8 IL-15 with CISH, TIGIT, and PDCD1 KO. Data represented as mean ± SD. P-values calculated by two-way ANOVA test.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Multiplex edited CD19 CAR-NK cells are highly functional in vivo.
a Schema of in vivo study design and timeline. b-c Luminance (ROI) of individual tumor burden of mice bearing Rajihi/hi cells following treatment with PBS, Ctrl or engineered NK cells. d Tumor burden of each group on day 23, quantified by ROI (photons/sec) of each mouse (n=5). P-values calculated by one-way ANOVA test (*P ≤ 0.05). e Survival curve of each group shown in Kaplan-Meier curve (n=5). P-values calculated by Mantel-Cox test. Ctrl versus CAR15, **P ≤ 0.01; Ctrl versus CAR15/CTPKO, *P ≤ 0.05. f Numbers of circulating NK cells measured by NK cell number per uL of peripheral blood at end point. Data represented as mean ± SD.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ruggeri L. et al. Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants. Science 295, 2097–2100 (2002). - PubMed
    1. Pan K. et al. CAR race to cancer immunotherapy: from CAR T, CAR NK to CAR macrophage therapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 41, 119 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suck G. et al. NK-92: an ‘off-the-shelf therapeutic’ for adoptive natural killer cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 65, 485–492 (2016). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller J. S. & Lanier L. L. Natural Killer Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 3, 77–103 (2019).
    1. Judge S. J., Murphy W. J. & Canter R. J. Characterizing the Dysfunctional NK Cell: Assessing the Clinical Relevance of Exhaustion, Anergy, and Senescence. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10, 49 (2020). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types