Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):307-320.
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-691. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

Does dose reduction of afatinib affect treatment outcomes of patients with EGFR-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in real-world clinical practice?

Affiliations

Does dose reduction of afatinib affect treatment outcomes of patients with EGFR-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in real-world clinical practice?

Mau Ern Poh et al. Transl Lung Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Background: Afatinib can be started at a dose lower than the recommended starting dose of 40 mg/day for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however treatment outcomes in real-world clinical practice remains unclear.

Methods: This retrospective study of patients with NSCLC from 18 major hospitals (public, private or university teaching hospitals) enrolled in Malaysia's National Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgical Database (NCTSD) assessed the efficacy of lower doses of afatinib on treatment outcomes in a real-world clinical practice. Data on clinical characteristics, afatinib dosing, and treatment outcomes for patients included in NCTSD from 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2020 were analyzed.

Results: Of the 133 patients studied, 94.7% had adenocarcinoma. Majority of the patients (60.9%) had EGFR exon 19 deletion and 23.3% had EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation. The mean age of patients was 64.1 years and majority (83.5%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2-4 at diagnosis. The most common afatinib starting doses were 40 mg (37.6%), 30 mg (29.3%), and 20 mg (26.3%) once daily (OD), respectively. A quarter of patients had dose reduction (23.3%) due to side effects or cost constraints. Majority of the patients had partial response to afatinib (63.2%) whilst 2.3% had complete response. Interestingly, the objective response rate was significantly higher (72.3%) with afatinib OD doses of less than 40 mg compared to 40 mg (54.0%) (P=0.032). Patients on lower doses of afatinib were two times more likely to achieve an objective response [odds ratio =2.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-5.83; P=0.016]. These patients had a numerically but not statistically longer median time to treatment failure (TTF). Median TTF (95% CI) for the overall cohort was 12.4 (10.02-14.78) months. Median overall survival (95% CI) was 21.30 (15.86-26.75) months.

Conclusions: Lower afatinib doses (<40 mg OD) could be equally effective as standard dose in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and may be more suited to Asian patients, minimizing side effects that may occur at higher dosages of afatinib leading to dose interruptions and affecting treatment outcomes.

Keywords: Adenocarcinoma; resource-limited settings; survival; treatment outcome; tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-23-691/coif). G.F.H. reports grants or contracts from AUXI Therapeutics and Taiho; payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Adipolab, Amgen, Astrazeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dr Reddy, Eisai, MSD, Pfizer, Servier. Y.K.P. reports payments as speaker from AstraZeneca, GSK, and Pfizer; support for attending the European Respiratory Society Congress 2022 from EuroDrug; participation on Advisory Boards for Amgen, Eurodrug Laboratories, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Orient Europharma, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Specialised Therapeutics; research funding from AstraZeneca, MSD, and Sanofi; duty as trustee for Lung Foundation of Malaysia, and role as the Immediate Past President for the Malaysian Thoracic Society. L.M.T. reports payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Fresenius Kabi, and Roche. I.M.N. reports speaker honoraria from Eisei, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; Principal Investigator fees under Clinical Research Malaysia from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Mirati, MSD, and Novartis; travel grant for educational meetings/investigator meeting from Arcus, Eisei, ESMO, MSD, Novartis, and Roche; and monthly payments as Board of Director for Syarikat Hospital PUSRAWI Sdn. Bhd/ Syarikat MAIWP Healthcare Sdn Bhd from June 2021 to June 2023. K.F.H. reports payment or honoraria from EISAI; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merck, and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for MSD. M.T. reports honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim for a lecture in 2023 and is the current President of the Malaysian Oncological Society. S.H.H. reports funding from Boehringer Ingelheim for medical writing; grants or contracts from Arcus, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda, as well as receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study population. EGFRm+ NSCLC, epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer; TTF, time to treatment failure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier plot for time-to-treatment failure of patients on first-line afatinib. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curves for time-to-treatment failure for patients who received afatinib 40 mg once daily and those who received afatinib less than 40 mg once daily. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier plot for overall survival of patients on first-line afatinib. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier curves for time-to-treatment failure of patients on second-line osimertinib and that of patients treated with chemotherapy. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; tx, treatment.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Cancer [cited 2022 Feb 3]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer
    1. Globocan 2020. Malaysia [cited 2022 Mar]. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/458-malaysia-fact-...
    1. Ministry of Health Malaysia. National Strategic Plan for Cancer Control Programme 2021-2025; 2021. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.my/moh/resources/Penerbitan/Rujukan/NCD/Kanser/Natio...
    1. Tanaka H, Taima K, Itoga M, et al. Real-world study of afatinib in first-line or re-challenge settings for patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Med Oncol 2019;36:57. 10.1007/s12032-019-1278-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. How SH, Liam CK, Zainal Abidin MA, et al. Outcomes of Patients with EGFR-Mutant Advanced NSCLC in a Developing Country in Southeast Asia. Cancer Manag Res 2022;14:1995-2005. 10.2147/CMAR.S364713 - DOI - PMC - PubMed