A Review of Terman's "Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering"
- PMID: 38496714
- PMCID: PMC10941508
- DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12535
A Review of Terman's "Timely dying in dementia: Use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering"
Conflict of interest statement
The author has no conflicts of interest regarding this paper. Author disclosures are available in the supporting information.
References
-
- For examples and analysis of advance directives stressing concerns about indignity and burdens on others, see N.L. Cantor, “Dispelling Medico‐Legal Misconceptions Impeding Use of Advance Instructions to Shorten Immersion in Deep Dementia,” 41:1 J. Legal Medicine (2021), 29‐46, especially 33‐34 & 37‐38. - PubMed
-
- In re Browning, 568 So.2d 4, 12‐13 (Fla. 1991); In re Conroy, 486 A.2d 1209, 1229 (N.J. 1985); K.L. Cerminara & J.R. Kadis, Give me Liberty to Choose a Better Death, 10 St. Louis U. J. or Health Law & Policy 67‐92 (2016). A right to determine post‐competence medical fate might also be part of the liberty protected by the federal constitution according to dictum in Cruzan v. Missouri Dept of Health, 110 S.Ct. 2841 (1990).
-
- Cantor NL, “On Avoiding Deep Dementia,” 48:4 Hastings Center Report (July 2018), 15‐24, at 17. - PubMed
-
- See W.J. Choi, “Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients,” J. Med. Ethics (Sept. 2022), (doi:10/1136/jme‐2022‐108475); E. Walsh, “Cognitive transformation, dementia, and the moral weight of advance directives,” 20:8 AJOB (2020), 54‐64; J.L. Wright, et al, “Stopping Eating and Dr.inking by Advance Directive,” 20:11 JAMDA (Nov. 2019) 1362‐66; D.P. Sulmasy, “An Open Letter Regarding Dementia and Physician‐Assisted Dying,” 48:4 Hastings Center Rep. 28‐29 (2028); R. Drsser, “Toward a Humane Death with Dementia,” 44:3 Hastings Center Report 38‐40 (2014).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources