Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;55(3):278-291.
doi: 10.1177/00220221241230959. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

Honor Values as Identity Content: Evidence From a Three-Wave Longitudinal Study

Affiliations

Honor Values as Identity Content: Evidence From a Three-Wave Longitudinal Study

Giovanni A Travaglino et al. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Reputation refers to the set of judgments a community makes about its members. In cultures of honor, reputation constitutes one of the most pressing concerns of individuals. Reputational concerns are intimately intertwined with people's social identities. However, research has yet to address the question of how honor-related reputational concerns are structured at the within-person level vis-à-vis individuals' identification with relevant group memberships. The present longitudinal study investigated the association between social identification and reputational concerns in southern Italy (N1st-wave = 1,173), a little-studied culture of honor. Specifically, using a random intercept cross-lagged panel model, we tested whether reputational concerns predict, are predicted by, or are bidirectionally linked to individuals' identification with their region, a group membership relevant for the endorsement of honor. Findings revealed a positive association at the within-person level between group identification and subsequent honor-related concerns. Longitudinal paths from reputational concerns to identification were not significant. Implications of the findings and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords: cultures of honor; honor values; regional identification; reputation; social identity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Significant Paths (Standardized) of the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model. Note. RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CI = confidence interval; CFI = comparative fit index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abrams D., Palmer S. B., Van De Vyver J., Hayes D., Delaney K., Guarella S., Purewal K. (2017). Adolescents’ judgments of doubly deviant peers: Implications of intergroup and intragroup dynamics for disloyal and overweight group members. Social Development, 26(2), 310–328. 10.1111/sode.12187 - DOI
    1. Abrams D., Weick M., Thomas D., Colbe H., Franklin K. M. (2011). On-line ostracism affects children differently from adolescents and adults: Ostracism: Children, adolescents, adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 110–123. 10.1348/026151010X494089 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnes C. D., Brown R. P., Lenes J., Bosson J., Carvallo M. (2014). My country, my self: Honor, identity, and defensive responses to national threats. Self and Identity, 13(6), 638–662. 10.1080/15298868.2014.892529 - DOI
    1. Barnes C. D., Brown R. P., Tamborski M. (2012). Living dangerously: Culture of honor, risk-taking, and the nonrandomness of “accidental” deaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 100–107. 10.1177/1948550611410440 - DOI
    1. Bowman J. (2006). Honor: A history (1st ed.). Encounter Books.