Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 18;35(3):813-821.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010071. Online ahead of print.

3D Analysis of the Cranial and Facial Shape in Craniosynostosis Patients: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

3D Analysis of the Cranial and Facial Shape in Craniosynostosis Patients: A Systematic Review

Melissa S I C Kurniawan et al. J Craniofac Surg. .

Abstract

With increasing interest in 3D photogrammetry, diverse methods have been developed for craniofacial shape analysis in craniosynostosis patients. This review provides an overview of these methods and offers recommendations for future studies. A systematic literature search was used to identify publications on 3D photogrammetry analyses in craniosynostosis patients until August 2023. Inclusion criteria were original research reporting on 3D photogrammetry analyses in patients with craniosynostosis and written in English. Sixty-three publications that had reproducible methods for measuring cranial, forehead, or facial shape were included in the systematic review. Cranial shape changes were commonly assessed using heat maps and curvature analyses. Publications assessing the forehead utilized volumetric measurements, angles, ratios, and mirroring techniques. Mirroring techniques were frequently used to determine facial asymmetry. Although 3D photogrammetry shows promise, methods vary widely between standardized and less conventional measurements. A standardized protocol for the selection and documentation of landmarks, planes, and measurements across the cranium, forehead, and face is essential for consistent clinical and research applications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA diagram.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Base planes with corresponding landmarks 2.1. Opistocranion—lower orbital 2.2. Sella turcica/dorsum sella—nasion/sellion 2.3. Tragus—lateral canthus 2.4. Preaurale—nasion/sellion 2.5. Porion—lower orbital 2.6. Tragus—subnasale 2.7. Tragus—nasion/sellion.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forehead measurements. 3.1. Frontal prominence in angles; 3.2. Forehead volume; 3.3. Frontal angle and Frontoparietal angle; 3.4. Frontal angle and frontal width. Ns/Se, nasion/sellion; Gl, glabella; Pr, prenasale; CrH, crus helix; FTPl/ZFl, frontotemporal point left/zygomaticofrontal left; PA, parietal point; PrAu, preaurale; FA30, Frontal angle 30; A/B/C/D/E, corresponding to Rodriguez-Florez.

References

    1. Ghali GZ, Zaki Ghali MG, Ghali EZ, et al. . Intracranial venous hypertension in craniosynostosis: mechanistic underpinnings and therapeutic implications. World Neurosurg 2019;127:549–558 - PubMed
    1. Kapp-Simon KA, Wallace E, Collett BR, et al. . Language, learning, and memory in children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016;17:578–588 - PubMed
    1. Still MEH, Chidarala S, Alvarado A, et al. . Craniosynostosis surgery for increased intracranial pressure. J Craniofac Surg 2022;33:1454–1457 - PubMed
    1. Thiele-Nygaard AE, Foss-Skiftesvik J, Juhler M. Intracranial pressure, brain morphology and cognitive outcome in children with sagittal craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2020;36:689–695 - PubMed
    1. Mathijssen IMJ, Working Group Guideline C . Updated guideline on treatment and management of craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2021;32:371–450 - PMC - PubMed