Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;11(3):649-662.
doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00661-6. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

Long-Term Efficacy Following Intra-articular Injection of Carboxymethyl-chitosan, a New Product Class for Knee Osteoarthritis: Results from an Observational Study in Germany

Affiliations

Long-Term Efficacy Following Intra-articular Injection of Carboxymethyl-chitosan, a New Product Class for Knee Osteoarthritis: Results from an Observational Study in Germany

Nils A Lynen et al. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Evaluate the real-world efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of carboxymethyl-chitosan (CM-chitosan), a new product class for knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: This post-marketing study included adult patients with knee OA, who received a single injection of 60 mg CM-chitosan (currently marketed as KioMedinevsone) according to the instructions for use. Follow-up was performed at weeks 1, 12, 24, and 36. Efficacy was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Patient's Global Assessment (PGA), and overall patient satisfaction.

Results: Forty-nine patients were included in the study. VAS pain score significantly decreased from a median of 49.0 mm at baseline to 24.0 mm at week 1 and to 18 mm at week 36. Pain improvement was stable since at week 36; 91.8% of patients confirmed pain reduction. All KOOS subscales (symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sports and recreational activities, quality of life) improved significantly compared to baseline at all time points. KOOS pain improved progressively from a median of 58.3% at baseline (mean 56.2 ± 18.8%) to 86.1% (mean 74.1 ± 24%) at week 36 compared to baseline. Overall, more than 70% of patients reported a condition gain (PGA), matching well with the more than 75% of patients being satisfied with the treatment. At 6 months, 72.7% of the patients could be classified as responder according to the OMERACT-OARSI proposed set of responder criteria.

Conclusion: CM-chitosan showed a rapid onset of pain relief after 1 week and with a duration of 9 months. In a real-world setting, treatment with CM-chitosan would appear to be a potentially effective option to reduce pain and improve physical function and global condition in patients with knee OA, opening new perspectives in patients who are considered as refractory to current symptomatic therapies and where the unmet need is high.

Trial registration number: NCT04757051 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Keywords: CM-chitosan; Joint; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Real-life setting; Real-world evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nicolas Portelange, Mickael Chausson and Wim Weyenberg are employees for KiOmed Pharma, Herstal, Belgium. Nils Lynen and Christoph Eichhorn have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram. *One patient excluded from analysis after meeting an exclusion criterion following inclusion. n number of patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Evolution of VAS pain score [mm]. Data are presented as mean value, and standard deviation (error bars), *p < 0.001 versus baseline. VAS Visual Analog Scale
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of mean KOOS scores at the different time points. ADL activities of daily living, QoL quality of life, Sport/Rec sports and recreational activities
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Subscale KOOS pain from baseline to week 36. Data are presented as median value, and 25th and 75th percentiles, minimum and maximum (error bars), p < 0.001 versus baseline
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Subscale KOOS ADL from baseline to week 36. Data are presented as median value, and 25th and 75th percentiles, minimum and maximum (error bars), p < 0.001 versus baseline

References

    1. GBD 2021 Osteoarthritis Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990-2020 and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5(9):e508–e522. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00163-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glyn-Jones S, Palmer AJ, Agricola R, et al. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2015;386(9991):376–387. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60802-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: part I. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011;2(2):205–212. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cui A, Li H, Wang D, Zhong J, Chen Y, Lu H. Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;29–30:100587. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30331.... Accessed 07 Aug 2023. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wittenauer R, Smith L, Aden K. Background paper 612 osteoarthritis. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2013.

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources