Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Mar;13(5):10.1002/cam4.6776.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6776.

A phase Ib study evaluating the recommended phase II dose, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mivavotinib in combination with nivolumab in advanced solid tumors

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A phase Ib study evaluating the recommended phase II dose, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mivavotinib in combination with nivolumab in advanced solid tumors

Dejan Juric et al. Cancer Med. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Mivavotinib (TAK-659/CB-659), a dual SYK/FLT3 inhibitor, reduced immunosuppressive immune cell populations and suppressed tumor growth in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy in cancer models. This dose-escalation/expansion study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of mivavotinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received oral mivavotinib 60-100 mg once-daily plus intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dose-escalation phase evaluated the recommended phase II dose (RP2D; primary endpoint). The expansion phase evaluated overall response rate (primary end point) at the RP2D in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). During dose-escalation (n = 24), two dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 lipase increased and grade 3 pyrexia) occurred in patients who received mivavotinib 80 mg and 100 mg, respectively. The determined RP2D was once-daily mivavotinib 80 mg plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg. The expansion phase was terminated at ~50% enrollment (n = 17) after failing to meet an ad hoc efficacy futility threshold. Among all 41 patients, common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included dyspnea (48.8%), aspartate aminotransferase increased, and pyrexia (46.3% each). Common grade ≥3 TEAEs were hypophosphatemia and anemia (26.8% each). Mivavotinib plasma exposure was generally dose-proportional (60-100 mg). One patient had a partial response. Mivavotinib 80 mg plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg was well tolerated with no new safety signals beyond those of single-agent mivavotinib or nivolumab. Low response rates highlight the challenges of treating unresponsive tumor types, such as TNBC, with this combination and immunotherapies in general. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: NCT02834247.

Keywords: TNBC; immunotherapy; mivavotinib; phase Ib; solid tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dejan Juric reports consulting fees from Novartis, Genentech, Syros, Eisai, Vibliome, PIC Therapeutics, Mapkure, Relay Therapeutics, and Eli Lilly; and grants or funds from Novartis, Genentech, Syros, Eisai, Pfizer, Amgen, InventisBio, Arvinas, Takeda, Blueprint, AstraZeneca, Ribon Therapeutics, Infinity, and Eli Lilly. Ulka Vaishampayan reports honoraria from Sanofi, Bayer, and Exelixis; consulting fees from BMS, Bayer, Alkermes, Gilead, Exelixis, Merck and Pfizer; and grants or funds from BMS and Exelixis. Desamparados Roda reports an advisory council or committee position for Abbvie M19‐345 Phase 1 program. Jose Trigo reports advisory council or committee positions at AstraZeneca, BMS, Bayer, EISAI, MSD, and Janssen; and grants or funds from MSD, BMS and AstraZeneca. Alastair Greystoke reports honoraria and consulting fees from Takeda. R. Donald Harvey reports consulting fees from Amgen and GlaxoSmithKline; and research funding to their institution that supports their salary from Abbisko, AbbVie, Actuate, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Boston Biomedical, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity, InhibRx, Janssen, Merck, Mersana, Meryx, Morphosys, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sutro, Takeda, Turning Point Therapeutics, and Xencor. Anthony J. Olszanski reports advisory council or committee positions for Merck, BMS, Novartis, Eisai, Nektar, and InstilBio; and honoraria from Pfizer. Mateusz Opyrchal reports advisory council or committee position for Alphageneron; and grants or funds from Eli Lilly and Pfizer. Alexander Spira reports employment at NEXT Oncology Virginia; ownership of stocks/shares at Eli Lilly; honoraria from CytomX Therapeutics, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Merck, Takeda, Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Novartis, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, and Bayer; consulting fees from Incyte, Amgen, Novartis, Mirati Therapeutics, Gristone Oncology, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Janssen, Mersana, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Regeneron, Lilly and Black Diamond Therapeutics; and grants or funds from LAM Therapeutics, and Regeneron. Fiona Thistlethwaite reports advisory council or committee position at T‐knife Therapeutics (scientific advisory board member); honoraria from Kite; ad hoc consultancy fees from Adicet Bio, BMS, F‐Star, GSK, Ixaka, Janssen, Leucid, and QPCTL Scenic Biotech in the last 2 years; and grants or funds from GSK. Begoña Jiménez reports speaker fees from Roche, Daichii Sankyo, and Lilly; and travel funds from Gilead. Karuppiah Kannan and Jason Riley report employment with Takeda. Cheryl Li, Cong Li, Richard C. Gregory, Harry Miao, and Shining Wang report employment and ownership of stocks/shares with Takeda. Minal Barve, Aitana Calvo, Noelia Martinez Jañez, and Jessica Huck Sappal declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Tumor growth inhibition curves for single and combination therapy of mivavotinib and anti‐PD‐1 in the CT26 syngeneic mouse tumor model. (B) Tumor rechallenge. (C) Pharmacodynamic assessment. M1/M2, M1/M2 macrophages; PD‐1, programmed death‐1 receptor; TNFa, tumor necrosis factor alfa. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, and ***p ≤ 0.001. One‐Way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test, with a single pooled variance.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Change from screening to day 15 in (A) CD4, CD8 and Treg cells expression, (B) memory T cells and PD‐L1 positivity, (C) monocytes, B cells and PD‐L1 expression, assessed by multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry of paired tumor biopsies from one patient with TNBC treated with single‐agent mivavotinib. Change from screening to day 15 in (D) tumoral T cells, (E) monocytes, NK cells, and B cells, and (F) CD68+ monocytes/macrophages, assessed by multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry of paired tumor biopsies from three TNBC patients in the expansion phase. C, cycle; D, day; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin staining; NK, natural killer; PanCK, pan‐cytokeratin; PD‐L1, programmed death‐ligand 1; TNBC, triple‐negative breast cancer; Treg, regulatory T cells.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Changes in peripheral T cells, B cells, and monocytes in patients treated with mivavotinib and nivolumab assessed by flow cytometry. C, cycle; D, day; EOT, end of treatment; SCR, screening; Treg, regulatory T cells.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Mean (SD) plasma mivavotinib concentration–time profiles after a single‐dose of mivavotinib on (A) day 1 of cycle 1 and after multiple‐dose administration on (B) day 15 of cycle 1 in patients receiving mivavotinib at 60 mg, 80 mg, or 100 mg QD in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg. QD, once daily; SD, standard deviation. Plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification of the assay (<0.5 ng/mL) were recorded as zero.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang Y, Jia A, Bi Y, et al. Targeting myeloid‐derived suppressor cells in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer. 2020;12:2626. - PMC - PubMed
    1. He J, Hu Y, Hu M, Li B. Development of PD‐1/PD‐L1 pathway in tumor immune microenvironment and treatment for non‐small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Francisco LM, Salinas VH, Brown KE, et al. PD‐L1 regulates the development, maintenance, and function of induced regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2009;206:3015‐3029. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:450‐461. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Sun HW, Yang YY, et al. Reprogramming immunosuppressive myeloid cells by activated T cells promotes the response to anti‐PD‐1 therapy in colorectal cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:4. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data