Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 1;38(4S):S23-S29.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002764.

Indications for Nonbiological Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Bone Defects About the Knee

Affiliations

Indications for Nonbiological Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Bone Defects About the Knee

Kevin D Tetsworth et al. J Orthop Trauma. .

Abstract

3D printing and modeling has continued to grow in popularity over the past decade because the technology has matured and become more affordable and widely available. The main indications for nonbiological reconstruction of large bone defects are principally those patients where the candidate is unlikely to be successful if reconstructed by other means. Bespoke, custom, patient-specific implants can be designed to very effectively address bone loss, incorporating design elements that are particular to the needs of any given unique clinical condition. These implants are generally designed as titanium scaffolds that encourage bony incorporation at the host implant junction both proximal and distal. These scaffolds are typically considered a cellular solid, with high porosity that also promotes bone ingrowth directly into the substance of the body of the implant. Titanium scaffolds of this type have become a useful treatment alternative for large segmental bone defects around the knee, especially distal femoral defects. These are often adult patients with local or systemic compromise, or instead they may be too young to be considered candidates for reconstruction using a megaprosthesis. The process requires careful evaluation of individual patients, then matching that patient with the best treatment option, while recognizing the expectations and demands specific to that particular patient. Several cases are presented here to illustrate the variety of indications that can be successfully addressed with this technology, highlighting the quality of the clinical outcome that can be achieved despite the complexity of the pathology encountered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

K. D. Tetsworth reports no conflicts of interest declared related to this manuscript; consultant and speaker's bureau—Smith and Nephew, AO Foundation, OrthoDx, and BioBKN. Z. H. Welyczko reports no conflicts of interest declared related to this manuscript; no other conflicts to declare. S. M. Quinnan reports no conflicts of interest declared related to this manuscript; consultant Smith and Nephew, Globus Medical, NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics, OsteoCentric, Stryker, AO Foundation, Bone Support, Biocomposites, and EDge Medical.

References

    1. Tetsworth K, Mettyas T. Overview of emerging technology in orthopaedic surgery: what is the value in 3D modelling and printing? Tech Orthop. 2016;31:143–152.
    1. Green N, Glatt V, Tetsworth K, et al. A practical guide to image processing in the creation of 3D models for orthopedics. Tech Orthop. 2016;31:153–163.
    1. Alemayehu DG, Zhang Z, Tahir E, et al. Preoperative planning using 3D printing technology in orthopedic surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:7940242.
    1. Buford WL Jr, Turnbow BJ, Gugala Z, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography-based modeling of sagittal cadaveric femoral bowing and implications for intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:10–16.
    1. McCulloch RA, Frisoni T, Kurunskal V, et al. Computer navigation and 3D printing in the surgical management of bone sarcoma. Cells. 2021;10:195.

LinkOut - more resources