Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Mar;17(3):e016115.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.016115. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Predict Cardiac Mass Malignancy: The CMR Mass Score

Affiliations
Observational Study

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Predict Cardiac Mass Malignancy: The CMR Mass Score

Pasquale Paolisso et al. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Mar.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Multimodality imaging is currently suggested for the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac masses. The identification of cardiac masses' malignant nature is essential to guide proper treatment. We aimed to develop a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived model including mass localization, morphology, and tissue characterization to predict malignancy (with histology as gold standard), to compare its accuracy versus the diagnostic echocardiographic mass score, and to evaluate its prognostic ability.

Methods: Observational cohort study of 167 consecutive patients undergoing comprehensive echocardiogram and CMR within 1-month time interval for suspected cardiac mass. A definitive diagnosis was achieved by histological examination or, in the case of cardiac thrombi, by histology or radiological resolution after adequate anticoagulation treatment. Logistic regression was performed to assess CMR-derived independent predictors of malignancy, which were included in a predictive model to derive the CMR mass score. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to investigate the prognostic ability of predictors.

Results: In CMR, mass morphological features (non-left localization, sessile, polylobate, inhomogeneity, infiltration, and pericardial effusion) and mass tissue characterization features (first-pass perfusion and heterogeneity enhancement) were independent predictors of malignancy. The CMR mass score (range, 0-8 and cutoff, ≥5), including sessile appearance, polylobate shape, infiltration, pericardial effusion, first-pass contrast perfusion, and heterogeneity enhancement, showed excellent accuracy in predicting malignancy (areas under the curve, 0.976 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]), significantly higher than diagnostic echocardiographic mass score (areas under the curve, 0.932; P=0.040). The agreement between the diagnostic echocardiographic mass and CMR mass scores was good (κ=0.66). A CMR mass score of ≥5 predicted a higher risk of all-cause death (P<0.001; hazard ratio, 5.70) at follow-up.

Conclusions: A CMR-derived model, including mass morphology and tissue characterization, showed excellent accuracy, superior to echocardiography, in predicting cardiac masses malignancy, with prognostic implications.

Keywords: cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR); cardiac masses; echocardiography; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Case examples of cardiac masses features assessed at cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) through a systematic approach. Cardiac masses (CMs) assessment at CMR should aim (at least) to evaluate mass localization, mass morphology, and tissue characterization. (I) Mass localization (A through F): examples of the most common localization of CMs (left atrium [myxoma], right atrium [neoplastic thrombus in patient with renal carcinoma], left ventricle [metastasis of melanoma], right ventricle [metastasis of urothelial carcinoma], pericardium [pericardial angioma], pulmonary artery/vein [atrial leiomyosarcoma]). (II) Mass morphology (G through L): examples of the CMs’ morphological features assessed (pedunculate [atrial myxoma], sessile [cardiac angiosarcoma], infiltration [aggressive B Lymphoma], polylobate [metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma], inhomogeneous appearance [metastasis of urothelial carcinoma], pericardial effusion [metastasis of melanoma]). (III) Mass tissue characterization (M through R): Hypo/iso/hyperintensity at the following sequences: T1-weighted (atrial leiomyosarcoma), T2-weighted (pericardial paraganglioma), T1, fat saturation (FAT-SAT; lipoma of the right atrium), first-pass perfusion (metastasis of melanoma), early gadolinium enhancement (EGE; left ventricular thrombus), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE; metastasis of melanoma). T1w-TSE indicates T1-weighted turbo spin echo; and T2w-TSE, T2-weighted turbo spin echo.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the diagnostic echocardiographic mass (DEM) score (echocardiography), the cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived DEM score (Model 1), and the CMR mass score (Model 2) in predicting cardiac masses malignancy. *The comparisons between Models 1 and 2 and DEM score have been performed in the 151 patients in which echocardiography detected the presence of the cardiac mass.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Agreement between echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the assessment of morphological features of cardiac masses. TTE indicates transthoracic echocardiography.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier survival estimates (all-cause death) for patients with <5 vs ≥5 cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) features associated with malignancy.

Comment in

References

    1. D’Angelo EC, Paolisso P, Vitale G, Foà A, Bergamaschi L, Magnani I, Saturi G, Rinaldi A, Toniolo S, Renzulli M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography and 18-f fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cardiac masses. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:2400–2411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.03.021 - PubMed
    1. Lopez-Mattei JC, Lu Y. Multimodality imaging in cardiac masses: to standardize recommendations, the time is now! JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:2412–2414. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.04.009 - PubMed
    1. Tyebally S, Chen D, Bhattacharyya S, Mughrabi A, Hussain Z, Manisty C, Westwood M, Ghosh AK, Guha A. Cardiac tumors: JACC cardiooncology state-of-the-art review. JACC CardioOncol. 2020;2:293–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.05.009 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rahouma M, Arisha MJ, Elmously A, El-Sayed Ahmed MM, Spadaccio C, Mehta K, Baudo M, Kamel M, Mansor E, Ruan Y, et al. Cardiac tumors prevalence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020;76:178–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.039 - PubMed
    1. Sultan I, Bianco V, Habertheuer A, Kilic A, Gleason TG, Aranda-Michel E, Harinstein ME, Martinez-Meehan D, Arnaoutakis G, Okusanya O. Long-term outcomes of primary cardiac malignancies: multi-institutional results from the national cancer database. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2338–2347. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.041 - PubMed

Publication types