Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec;56(1):2329136.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2329136. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

A differential diagnosis method for systemic CAEBV and the prospect of EBV-related immune cell markers via flow cytometry

Affiliations
Review

A differential diagnosis method for systemic CAEBV and the prospect of EBV-related immune cell markers via flow cytometry

Jie Jin et al. Ann Med. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (CAEBV) infection of the T-cell or Natural killer (NK)-cell type, systemic form (systemic CAEBV or sCAEBV) was defined by the WHO in 2017 as an EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorder and is listed as an EBV-positive T-cell and NK-cell proliferation. The clinical manifestations and prognoses are heterogeneous. This makes systemic CAEBV indistinguishable from other EBV-positive T-cell and NK-cell proliferations. Early diagnosis of systemic CAEBV and early hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can improve patient prognosis. At present, the diagnosis of systemic CAEBV relies mainly on age, clinical manifestations, and cell lineage, incurring missed diagnosis, misdiagnosis, long diagnosis time, and inability to identify high-risk systemic CAEBV early. The diagnostic methods for systemic CAEBV are complicated and lack systematic description. The recent development of diagnostic procedures, including molecular biological and immunological techniques such as flow cytometry, has provided us with the ability to better understand the proliferation of other EBV-positive T cells and NK cells, but there is no definitive review of their value in diagnosing systemic CAEBV. This article summarizes the recent progress in systemic CAEBV differential diagnosis and the prospects of flow cytometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proposed diagram illustrating the various approaches for diagnosing and managing EBV infection. Sys-CAEBV: systemic CAEBV, LPD: lymphoproliferative disorders, HLH: haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, IM: Infectious monocytosis. FCM: flow cytometry Dotted arrow(): possible, red arrow () : reconfirmed.

References

    1. Cohen JI. Epstein-Barr virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(7):1–18. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008173430707. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fujiwara S, Nakamura H.. Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection: is it immunodeficiency, malignancy, or both? Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(11):3202. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113202. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kimura H. EBV in T-/NK-cell tumorigenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1045:459–475. - PubMed
    1. Fernandez-Pol S, Silva O, Natkunam Y.. Defining the elusive boundaries of chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection. Haematologica. 2018;103(6):924–927. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.193714. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang P, Zeng C, Cheng J, et al. Determination of Epstein-Barr virus-infected lymphocyte cell types in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as a valuable diagnostic tool in hematological diseases. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(5):ofz171. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources