The Impact of Social Vulnerability on Substance Use Detection Practices in Pregnancy
- PMID: 38503303
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782686
The Impact of Social Vulnerability on Substance Use Detection Practices in Pregnancy
Abstract
This study aimed to synthesize current literature regarding the impact of social vulnerability on pregnancy-related substance use detection in the United States and highlight disparities in substance use detection practices. Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, PubMed (includes MEDLINE), and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): (["pregnancy" or "prenatal"] AND ["substance use screening" or "urine toxicology testing" or "toxicology testing" or "urine drug screening" or "CRAFFT" or "4P's" or "4P's Plus" or "NIDA Quick Screen" or "DAST-10" or "SURP-P" or "WIDUS"], AND ("bias" or "disparities" or "social vulnerability"]). The search included systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies, randomized controlled trials, case studies, and qualitative and quantitative research from January 2014 through November 2023. Selected literature was limited to studies published in English, which included a study population of either pregnant individuals or pregnancy health care providers in the United States, and that were focused on inequities in pregnancy substance use detection. Using Covidence, three authors screened abstracts, and two screened full articles for inclusion. The included studies were evaluated for quality of evidence using the mixed methods appraisal tool. The search yielded 4,188 manuscripts; 37 were eligible for full review. A total of 18 manuscripts were included based on the relevancy of the topic. The most common social vulnerability domain identified was minority status (17/18), followed by socioeconomic status (11/18), household characteristics (8/18), and housing type (1/18). Social vulnerability plays a role in substance use detection among pregnant individuals. Most notably, race and ethnicity, age, and public insurance lead to increased rates of detection, though most individual factors need to be studied in greater depth. This study was registered with PROSPERO (PROSPERO ID CRD42022352598), the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. KEY POINTS: · Socially vulnerable pregnant individuals are more likely to receive substance use screening or urine toxicology testing.. · Race, ethnicity, age, and insurance influence substance use detection disparities.. · More research is needed to understand how other characteristics influence disparities in substance use detection..
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of Three Screening Tools for Prenatal Substance Use.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):952-961. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003230. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30969217 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Patient Perceptions of Three Substance Use Screening Tools for Use During Pregnancy.Matern Child Health J. 2022 Jul;26(7):1488-1495. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03442-1. Epub 2022 Apr 24. Matern Child Health J. 2022. PMID: 35461364
-
Social Determinants of Pregnancy-Related Mortality and Morbidity in the United States: A Systematic Review.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;135(4):896-915. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003762. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32168209 Free PMC article.
-
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 37131927 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Social Vulnerability Index on Betamethasone Timing in Patients at Risk of Preterm Birth.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 20;13(24):7798. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247798. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39768721 Free PMC article.