Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):a041453.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041453.

Combining Molecular, Macroevolutionary, and Macroecological Perspectives on the Generation of Diversity

Affiliations
Review

Combining Molecular, Macroevolutionary, and Macroecological Perspectives on the Generation of Diversity

Lindell Bromham. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. .

Abstract

Charles Darwin presented a unified process of diversification driven by the gradual accumulation of heritable variation. The growth in DNA databases and the increase in genomic sequencing, combined with advances in molecular phylogenetic analyses, gives us an opportunity to realize Darwin's vision, connecting the generation of variation to the diversification of lineages. The rate of molecular evolution is correlated with the rate of diversification across animals and plants, but the relationship between genome change and speciation is complex: Mutation rates evolve in response to life history and niche; substitution rates are influenced by mutation, selection, and population size; rates of acquisition of reproductive isolation vary between populations; and traits, niches, and distribution can influence diversification rates. The connection between mutation rate and diversification rate is one part of the complex and varied story of speciation, which has theoretical importance for understanding the generation of biodiversity and also practical impacts on the use of DNA to understand the dynamics of speciation over macroevolutionary timescales.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addo-Bediako A, Chown S, Gaston K. 2002. Metabolic cold adaptation in insects: a large-scale perspective. Funct Ecol 16: 332–338. 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00634.x - DOI
    1. Albarracín VH, Pathak GP, Douki T, Cadet J, Borsarelli CD, Gärtner W, Farias ME. 2012. Extremophilic Acinetobacter strains from high-altitude lakes in Argentinean Puna: remarkable UV-B resistance and efficient DNA damage repair. Orig Life Evol Biosph 42: 201–221. 10.1007/s11084-012-9276-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen AP, Gillooly JF, Savage VM, Brown JH. 2006. Kinetic effects of temperature on rates of genetic divergence and speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 9130–9135. 10.1073/pnas.0603587103 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alton LA, Franklin CE. 2017. Drivers of amphibian declines: effects of ultraviolet radiation and interactions with other environmental factors. Clim Chang Responses 4: 1–26. 10.1186/s40665-017-0034-7 - DOI
    1. Baack E, Melo MC, Rieseberg LH, Ortiz-Barrientos D. 2015. The origins of reproductive isolation in plants. New Phytol 207: 968–984. 10.1111/nph.13424 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources