Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6580.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57068-0.

Shaking table test on seismic performance of a large-span high-rise building

Affiliations

Shaking table test on seismic performance of a large-span high-rise building

Laite Sun et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This paper describes investigations in respect of the seismic performance of a large-span high-rise building in a mountainous area. The building consists of a 135 m high shear wall structure and a 174.5 m long steel truss structure, with dampers used to enhance the seismic performance. A 1/40 scale model of the prototype structure was designed, and shaking table tests was conducted. The experiments simulated the wave passage effect and slope amplification effect based on the building site and structural characteristics of the prototype structure. The seismic performance of the prototype structure was analyzed through the damage phenomenon, dynamic characteristics, and dynamic response of the model under earthquake effects. The results show that three seismic waves were delayed by about 0.4 s and amplified by about 1.6 times after passing through the steel frame with viscous dampers, which could effectively simulate the wave passage effect and slope amplification effect in the test. The maximum story drift ratios of the model shear wall structure and steel truss structure were 1/1258 and 1/455 for the SLE and 1/568 and 1/185 for the MCE. The damping devices played a key role in energy dissipation. As a result, this research provides a reference for the seismic design and shaking table testing of large-span high-rise buildings.

Keywords: Large-span high-rise building; Scale model design; Seismic response; Shaking table test; Slope amplification effect; Wave passage effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A large-span high-rise building (the cliff hotel).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The structural system.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plan layout of shear wall structure. (a) Base-6 floors; (b) floors 7–25.
Figure 4
Figure 4
3D graph of steel truss structure.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Layout of damping devices. (a) BRBs; (b) CBDs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Structural supports.
Figure 7
Figure 7
BRB1 model size.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The input seismic waves. (a) The Coalinga wave; (b) the Morgan Hill wave; (c) the artificial wave; (d) response spectrum.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Steel frame structure and prototype structure.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Complete scale model. (a) prototype model and steel frame; (b) steel frame with viscous dampers.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Layout of accelerometer.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Model construction process: (a) crack at connecting beam of 6th floor; (b) crack at corner of the opening of 14th floor; (c) crack at corner of the opening of 19th floor; (d) crack at corner of the opening of 10th floor; (e) crack at shear wall of 17th floor; (f) local buckling at 26th floor.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Model acceleration response: (a) SLE; (b) DBE; (c) MCE.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Model displacement response: (a) SLE; (b) DBE; (c) MCE.

Similar articles

References

    1. Fan H, Li Q, Tuan A, Xu L. Seismic analysis of the world’s tallest building. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2009;35:1206–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.10.005. - DOI
    1. Lu X, Zou Y, Lu W, Zhao B. Shaking table model test on Shanghai World Financial Center Tower. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2007;36:439–457. doi: 10.1002/eqe.634. - DOI
    1. Zhao B, Lin Y, Li X, Zhou Y. Shaking table test and seismic behavior of Ningbo Hengda Tower. Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build. 2022;32(1):e1987. doi: 10.1002/tal.1987. - DOI
    1. Guo Y, Huo Y. Analysis on earthquake response and aseismic load-carrying capability of New CCTV Building. J. Build. Struct. 2008;3:10–23. doi: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2008.03.002. - DOI
    1. Wu X, Wang J, Zhou J. Seismic performance analysis of a connected multitower structure with FPS and viscous damper. Shock Vib. 2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/1865761. - DOI