The gender-affirming model of care is incompatible with competent, ethical medical practice
- PMID: 38504453
- PMCID: PMC11103900
- DOI: 10.1177/10398562241239478
The gender-affirming model of care is incompatible with competent, ethical medical practice
Abstract
Objective: To examine the compatibility of gender-affirming care with the principles and practices of psychiatry.
Conclusions: The assumption that there is no pathology involved in the development of gender diversity is a necessary precondition for the unquestioning affirmation of self-reported gender identity. Cases where psychosis is the undeniable cause of gender diversity demonstrate this assumption is categorically false. To protect this false assumption, gender-affirming guidelines forbid the application of the core psychiatric competencies of phenomenology and psychopathology to the assessment of gender diversity. They substitute the political goal of expanding personal liberty for the evidence-based medicine processes of clinical reasoning, rendering them incompatible with competent, ethical medical practice.
Keywords: gender dysphoria; medical ethics; phenomenology; psychopathology.
Conflict of interest statement
DisclosureThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Amos AJ, Miller E, Halasz G. (2023) Can the AusPATH guidelines for gender dysphoria be clinically and ethically defensible when they do not address whether gender-based delusions are a contraindication for medical transition. [Unpublished - in preparation].
-
- Amos A. (2023) The WPATH guidelines on gender diversity rely on a clinician consensus that is not consistent with the limited evidence base. [Unpublished - in preparation].
-
- SA Health . State-wide gender diversity model of care. Adelaide: SA Health, 2023. https://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/d70c3a24-a054-4f6a-b56c-1...
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources