Neurobiological evidence and criminal competencies
- PMID: 38504495
- DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2655
Neurobiological evidence and criminal competencies
Abstract
Neuroimaging and other neurobiological evidences are increasingly introduced in criminal litigation, especially when a neuropsychiatric disorder is suspected. Evaluations of criminal competencies are the most common type of criminal forensic assessment in forensic psychiatry and psychology. Given this, it is critical for forensic evaluators to understand how neuropsychiatric disorders may affect a defendant's criminal competencies and how neurobiological data may be used in competency determinations. This paper reviews the use of neurobiological data, particularly neuroimaging, while considering the limitations and potential misuse of such data in criminal competency evaluations.
Keywords: competency evaluations; criminal cases; neurobiological data; neuroimaging; neuropsychiatric disorder.
© 2024 The Authors. Behavioral Sciences & The Law published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Clayton v. Roper, 2008 Clayton v. Roper, 515 F.3d 784 (8th Cir) (2008).
-
- Colorado v. Connelly, 1986 Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986).
-
- Denney, R. L. (2012). Criminal forensic neuropsychology and assessment of competency. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach (pp. 438–472). Oxford University Press.
-
- Dunlap v. Commonwealth, 2013 Dunlap v. Commonwealth, 435 S.W.3d 537 (Ky) (2013).
-
- Dusky v. United States, 1960 Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
