Performance of a single-use gastroscope for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective evaluation
- PMID: 38504741
- PMCID: PMC10948268
- DOI: 10.1055/a-2271-2303
Performance of a single-use gastroscope for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective evaluation
Erratum in
-
Correction: Performance of a single-use gastroscope for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective evaluation.Endosc Int Open. 2024 Sep 13;12(3):C6. doi: 10.1055/a-2412-6842. eCollection 2024 Mar. Endosc Int Open. 2024. PMID: 39279910 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background and study aims Reprocessing reusable endoscopes is challenging due to their non-sterilizable nature. Disinfection has been shown to have a significant risk of failure with serious consequences. Single-use endoscopes can eliminate contamination risk and reduce workflow delays caused by reprocessing. This study evaluated the clinical performance of single-use gastroscopes in patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Patients and methods In this case series, 60 patients underwent EGD using single-use gastroscopes, with 34 procedures in the endoscopy department and 26 in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was successful completion of the intended EGD objective. Furthermore, certified endoscopists assessed device performance on a five-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-"much worse" to 5-"much better"), considering their experience with a reusable gastroscope. Results Successful completion of EGDs using only the single-use gastroscope was achieved in 58 of 60 cases (96.7%). In two cases, crossover to an ultra-slim endoscope was necessary to either reach the esophageal stenosis or to transverse the stenosis. Overall satisfaction was rated as comparable to reusable scopes in 51 of 56 cases (91.1%) and inferior in five cases (8.9%). The lower weight of the single-use gastroscope was rated as superior in 42 of 60 cases (70.0%). Drawbacks included reduced image quality (23 of 45 cases; 51.1%). Feedback included the absence of a freeze button, lens cleaning issues, and small image size. Conclusions Single-use gastroscopes exhibited a high EGD completion rate and effectiveness for various indications. Further research should focus on evaluating the implementation of single-use gastroscopes in a comprehensive context, considering clinical effectiveness, costs, and environmental impact.
Keywords: Endoscopy Upper GI Tract; Hygiene; Performance and complications; Quality and logistical aspects.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest KvdP, ADK, WJL and VP declare no conflict of interests for this article. PJFJ acted as consultant/lecturer for Boston Scientific. MCV has received research support from Boston Scientific, 3M and Pentax Medical. LA is a member of the advisory board of AMBU. MJB has received research support from Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Pentax Medical, Mylan, ChiRoStim and acted as a consultant/lecturer for Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Pentax Medical and AMBU.
Figures
References
-
- ASGE Standards of Practice Committee . Early DS, Ben-Menachem T et al. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1127–1131. - PubMed
-
- ASGE Standards of Practice Committee . Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA et al. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:707–718. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
