Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 13:17:1309-1319.
doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S447855. eCollection 2024.

Missed Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Due to Selective Screening: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in the West Nile Sub-Region, Uganda

Affiliations

Missed Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Due to Selective Screening: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in the West Nile Sub-Region, Uganda

Vincent Abindu et al. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. .

Abstract

Purpose: To ascertain the prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnant women receiving antenatal care (ANC) services within the West Nile subregion of Uganda.

Patients and methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 233 pregnant women who are within 24-28 weeks of gestation and are receiving ANC services in selected hospitals. GDM was diagnosed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (2013). A questionnaire and anthropometric measurements were used to obtain relevant data. The chi-square test and logistic regression were used to determine the association between GDM and the study variables, including participants' sociodemographic and medical characteristics.

Results: The prevalence of hyperglycemia first detected in pregnancy among the participants tested was 8%. Overall, 7.45% had GDM and 0.53% had diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. The fasting plasma glucose test alone was positive in 86.7% of the GDM cases. The factors that were significantly associated with GDM included age ≥25 years (p = 0.017, AOR = 3.51) and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (p = 0.024, AOR = 2.67). Out of the participants diagnosed with GDM, 28.6% did not have a known risk factor. Of the pregnant women with GDM, 57% would have been missed if the selective screening in the national clinical guidelines had been followed. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and Candida were detected in 36.36% and 13.85% of the participants, respectively.

Conclusion: The study provides new data on the prevalence of GDM in rural settings in the West Nile subregion of Uganda. Of the participants, 7.5% were diagnosed with GDM, of which 57% would have been missed based on the selective screening of the national clinical guidelines. The study findings support the universal screening of GDM in pregnant women.

Keywords: gestational diabetes mellitus; prevalence; risk factors; selective screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A bar graph showing the variation in blood pressure of the study participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A pie chart showing the prevalence of hyperglycemia first detected in pregnancy among the study participants.

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. Classification of Diabetes Mellitus; 2019.
    1. Association AD. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Supplement_1):S81–S90. - PubMed
    1. Baz B, Riveline JP, Gautier JF. Endocrinology of pregnancy: gestational diabetes mellitus: definition, aetiological and clinical aspects. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(2):R43–R51. doi:10.1530/EJE-15-0378 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plows JF, Stanley JL, Baker PN, Reynolds CM, Vickers MH. The pathophysiology of gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3342. doi:10.3390/ijms19113342 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Global Report on Diabetes; 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565257. Accessed March 7, 2024.