Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun;115(6):1251-1257.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.3239. Epub 2024 Mar 20.

A Benefit-Risk Conceptual Framework for Biologic Use During Pregnancy: A Mini-Review

Affiliations
Review

A Benefit-Risk Conceptual Framework for Biologic Use During Pregnancy: A Mini-Review

Laura M Bozzi et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Recent reports related to in utero exposure of marketed immunosuppressive biologics led to clinical recommendations to delay live vaccinations for infants due to the concern of reduced vaccine effectiveness and/or increased risk of vaccine-related disease. These delays can increase the risk of children contracting vaccine preventable diseases, yet the alternative cessation of biologics during pregnancy may result in increased autoimmune disease activity for the pregnant person, raising complex benefit-risk (B-R) considerations and trade-offs. Our goal is to develop a conceptual framework for B-R assessment based on the key benefits and risks pregnant people would consider for themselves and their children when continuing (vs. discontinuing) a biologic during pregnancy. The proposed framework defines the decision contexts, key domains and attributes for potential benefits, and risks of biologic use during pregnancy, informed by a literature review of indications for biologics and refined with key clinical stakeholders. The framework includes both the pregnant person taking the biologic and the infant potentially exposed to the biologic in utero, with potential benefit and risk domains and attributes for each participant. To advance this conceptual framework, there are considerations of potential biases and uncertainty of available data that will be imperative to address when quantifying the B-R framework. For these reasons, we recommend the formation of a consortium to ensure development of a robust, validated framework that can be adopted in the healthcare setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Baumgart, D.C., Misery, L., Naeyaert, S. & Taylor, P.C. Biological therapies in immune‐mediated inflammatory diseases: can biosimilars reduce access inequities? Front. Pharmacol. 10, 279 (2019).
    1. Ghalandari, N., Dolhain, R.J.E.M., Hazes, J.M.W., van Puijenbroek, E.P., Kapur, M. & Crijns, H.J.M.J. Intrauterine exposure to biologics in inflammatory autoimmune diseases: a systematic review. Drugs 80, 1699–1722 (2020).
    1. Matro, R., Martin, C.F., Wolf, D., Shah, S.A. & Mahadevan, U. Exposure concentrations of infants breastfed by women receiving biologic therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases and effects of breastfeeding on infections and development. Gastroenterology 155, 696–704 (2018).
    1. Gisbert, J.P. & Chaparro, M. Vaccines in children exposed to biological agents in utero and/or during breastfeeding: are they effective and safe? J. Crohn's Colitis 17, 995–1009 (2023).
    1. Coplan, P.M., Noel, R.A., Levitan, B.S., Ferguson, J. & Mussen, F. Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit‐risk balance of medicines. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 89, 312–315 (2011).

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources