Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Mar 20;28(1):39.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02912-8.

Starting position during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

T McKechnie  1 , L Heimann  2 , T Kazi  3 , G Jessani  3 , Y Lee  1 , N Sne  1   3 , D Hong  1   3 , C Eskicioglu  4   5
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Starting position during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

T McKechnie et al. Tech Coloproctol. .

Abstract

Background: Traditional teaching has been to place patients in the left lateral decubitus starting position for colonoscopies. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared left lateral decubitus starting position to other approaches. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare different starting positions for colonoscopies and their effect on cecal intubation.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to July 2023. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they were RCTs comparing at least two different starting positions for adults undergoing colonoscopy. The main outcome was cecal intubation time. Meta-analysis used an inverse variance random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Tool for RCTs 2.0.

Results: After screening 1523 citations, 14 RCTs were included. Four studies compared left lateral decubitus to right lateral decubitus, four studies compared left lateral decubitus to left lateral tilt-down, three studies compared left lateral decubitus to prone, and three studies compared left lateral decubitus to supine. There were no statistically significant differences in cecal intubation time in seconds across all comparisons: left lateral decubitus vs. right lateral decubitus (MD 14.9, 95% CI - 111.8 to 141.6, p = 0.82, I2 = 85%); left lateral decubitus vs. left lateral tilt-down (MD - 31.3, 95% CI - 70.8 to 8.3, p = 0.12, I2 = 82%); left lateral decubitus vs. prone (MD 17.2, 95% CI - 174.9 to 209.4, p = 0.86, I2 = 94%); left lateral decubitus vs. supine (MD - 149.9, 95% CI - 443.6 to 143.9, p = 0.32, I2 = 89%).

Conclusion: The starting position for colonoscopies likely does not influence cecal intubation time. This study was limited by heterogeneity.

Keywords: Cecal intubation time; Colonoscopy; Colonoscopy quality indicators; Patient positioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Issa IA, Noured-Dine M (2017) Colorectal cancer screening: an updated review of the available options. World J Gastroenterol 23:5086–5096 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Il CJ, Kim N, Um MS et al (2010) Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center. Gut Liver 4:31–35. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2010.4.1.31 - DOI
    1. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (2023) Skills Enhancement for Endoscopy (SEE) Program. https://www.cag-acg.org/education/see-program . Accessed 18 May 2023
    1. Hoff G, Botteri E, Huppertz-Hauss G et al (2021) The effect of train-the-colonoscopy-trainer course on colonoscopy quality indicators. Endoscopy 53:1229–1234. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1352-4583 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evans B, Pace D, Borgaonkar M et al (2020) Effect of an educational intervention on colonoscopy quality outcomes. Surg Endosc 34:5142–5147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07304-w - DOI - PubMed