Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 20;14(3):e076527.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076527.

Symptomatic presentation of cancer in primary care: a scoping review of patients' experiences and needs during the cancer diagnostic pathway

Sally J Wheelwright  1 , Stephanie Russ  1 , Freda Mold  2 , Jo Armes  3 , Helena Harder  4
Affiliations

Symptomatic presentation of cancer in primary care: a scoping review of patients' experiences and needs during the cancer diagnostic pathway

Sally J Wheelwright et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to map the experiences and needs of patients presenting with symptoms of suspected cancer in the primary care interval (from when they first present to primary care to their first appointment or referral to a secondary or tertiary level healthcare facility).

Design: This was a scoping review.

Inclusion criteria: Studies or reports written in English which included primary data on the primary care interval experiences and/or needs of adult patients presenting with new symptoms of suspected cancer were eligible. Studies which only included patients with secondary or recurring cancer, conference abstracts and reviews were excluded. No date limits were applied.

Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute method for Scoping Reviews guided screening, report selection and data extraction. At least two independent reviewers contributed to each stage. Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Embase and Web of Science were searched and several grey literature resources. Relevant quantitative findings were qualitised and integrated with qualitative findings. A thematic analysis was carried out.

Results: Of the 4855 records identified in the database search, 18 were included in the review, along with 13 identified from other sources. The 31 included studies were published between 2002 and 2023 and most (n=17) were conducted in the UK. Twenty subthemes across four themes (patient experience, interpersonal, healthcare professional (HCP) skills, organisational) were identified. No studies included patient-reported outcome measures. Patients wanted (1) to feel heard and understood by HCPs, (2) a plan to establish what was causing their symptoms, and (3) information about the next stages of the diagnostic process.

Conclusions: Scoping review findings can contribute to service planning as the cancer diagnostic pathway for symptomatic presentation of cancer evolves. The effectiveness of this pathway should be evaluated not only in terms of clinical outcomes, but also patient-reported outcomes and experience, along with the perspectives of primary care HCPs.

Keywords: ONCOLOGY; Patient Satisfaction; Primary Care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Weiderpass E, et al. . The Ever‐Increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer 2021;127:3029–30. 10.1002/cncr.33587 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49. 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neal RD, Tharmanathan P, France B, et al. . Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? systematic review. Br J Cancer 2015;112:S92–107. 10.1038/bjc.2015.48 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Mosquera I, Lucas E, et al. . Canscreen5, a global repository for breast, Cervical and colorectal cancer screening programs. Nat Med 2023;29:1135–45. 10.1038/s41591-023-02315-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kerrison RS, Prentice A, Marshall S, et al. . Why are most colorectal cancers diagnosed outside of screening? A retrospective analysis of data from the English bowel screening programme. J Med Screen 2022;29:224–30.:09691413221100969. 10.1177/09691413221100969 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types