Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 20;14(1):6709.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55524-5.

Sex-specific associations of empirically derived dietary patterns with colorectal cancer risk in a Korean population: a case‒control study

Affiliations

Sex-specific associations of empirically derived dietary patterns with colorectal cancer risk in a Korean population: a case‒control study

Minji Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Dietary patterns may be a crucial modifiable factor in colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. This study aimed to examine the associations of dietary patterns derived from two methods with CRC risk in Korea. In a study of 1420 CRC patients and 2840 control participants, we obtained dietary patterns by principal component analysis (PCA) and reduced rank regression (RRR) using 33 predefined food groups. The associations between dietary patterns and CRC risk were assessed using unconditional logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We identified two similar dietary patterns, derived from PCA 1 (prudent) and RRR (healthy), characterized by higher consumption of green/yellow vegetables, light-colored vegetables, fruits, eggs, and milk in both men and women. In women, higher prudent and healthy pattern scores were significantly associated with a lower risk of CRC (prudent, ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.86, P for trend = 0.005; healthy, ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.89, P for trend = 0.007). In men, a significant inverse association between dietary pattern and risk of rectal cancer was found only for the healthy dietary pattern (ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97, P for trend = 0.036). Compared with the dietary pattern derived by PCA, the RRR dietary pattern had a slightly stronger association with a lower risk of distal colon cancer (ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.97, P for trend = 0.025) and rectal cancer (ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.57, P for trend < 0.001) in women. Our findings suggest cancer prevention strategies focusing on a diet rich in vegetables, fruits, eggs, and milk. Moreover, the use of both PCA and RRR methods may be advantageous to explore the associations between dietary patterns and risk of CRC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study participants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kang MJ, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: Incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2019. Cancer Res. Treat. 2022;54:330–344. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.128. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sninsky JA, Shore BM, Lupu GV, Crockett SD. Risk factors for colorectal polyps and cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am. 2022;32:195–213. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vargas AJ, Thompson PA. Diet and nutrient factors in colorectal cancer risk. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2012;27:613–623. doi: 10.1177/0884533612454885. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwingshackl L, et al. Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2018;142:1748–1758. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31198. - DOI - PubMed