Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 20;14(1):6722.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57441-z.

222 nm far-UVC light markedly reduces the level of infectious airborne virus in an occupied room

Affiliations

222 nm far-UVC light markedly reduces the level of infectious airborne virus in an occupied room

Manuela Buonanno et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

An emerging intervention for control of airborne-mediated pandemics and epidemics is whole-room far-UVC (200-235 nm). Laboratory studies have shown that 222-nm light inactivates airborne pathogens, potentially without harm to exposed occupants. While encouraging results have been reported in benchtop studies and in room-sized bioaerosol chambers, there is a need for quantitative studies of airborne pathogen reduction in occupied rooms. We quantified far-UVC mediated reduction of aerosolized murine norovirus (MNV) in an occupied mouse-cage cleaning room within an animal-care facility. Benchtop studies suggest that MNV is a conservative surrogate for airborne viruses such as influenza and coronavirus. Using four 222-nm fixtures installed in the ceiling, and staying well within current recommended regulatory limits, far-UVC reduced airborne infectious MNV by 99.8% (95% CI: 98.2-99.9%). Similar to previous room-sized bioaerosol chamber studies on far-UVC efficacy, these results suggest that aerosolized virus susceptibility is significantly higher in room-scale tests than in bench-scale laboratory studies. That said, as opposed to controlled laboratory studies, uncertainties in this study related to airflow patterns, virus residence time, and dose to the collected virus introduce uncertainty into the inactivation estimates. This study is the first to directly demonstrate far-UVC anti-microbial efficacy against airborne pathogens in an occupied indoor location.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.J.B. and other coinventors have a granted US patent entitled ‘Apparatus, method and system for selectively affecting and/or killing a virus’ (US10780189B2). Columbia University has licensed aspects of filtered UV light technology to Ushio Inc, and has received research support from Ushio Inc and LumenLabs Inc, companies producing far-UVC sources. All other authors have no competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Laboratory study results on inactivation of different aerosolized viruses exposed to graded doses of 222 nm far-UVC in a benchtop aerosol chamber. Results for aerosolized MNV are compared with human influenza A H1N1virus and human OC43 coronavirus. Fractional survival TCID50,UVC/TCID50, controls are plotted as a function of the 222-nm far-UVC dose. Values are reported as mean ± SD (n = 3) and the curves represents the best-fit robust bi-exponential regression (Eq. 1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measured reduction of pseudo steady-state murine norovirus (MNV) load in air samples collected in a mouse-cage changing room during routine work activities of the animal husbandry staff. Normalized MNV surviving fraction are shown on a log scale with far-UVC (n = 12 measurements) or without far-UVC (n = 8 measurements) ± SD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The mouse-cage changing room. (a) Floorplan of the mouse-cage changing room with the measured interpolated horizontal irradiance data overlaid. Horizontal irradiance was measured at 1.8 m. The locations of the four lamps on the ceiling are indicated with filled black circles. The position of the air sampler (used at 2.1 m) is marked with a star. (b) Photo of a section of the room showing the four far-UVC lamps turned on and the location of the shelf where the MD8 portable air sampler was located during air sampling.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nardell EA. Air disinfection for airborne infection control with a focus on COVID-19: Why germicidal UV is essential (dagger) Photochem. Photobiol. 2021;97:493–497. doi: 10.1111/php.13421. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wells WF. Air disinfection in day schools. Am. J. Public Health Nations Health. 1943;33:1436–1443. doi: 10.2105/ajph.33.12.1436. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luckiesh, M. Application of Germidical, Erythemal and Infrared Energy (D. Van Nostrand, 1946).
    1. Reed NG. The history of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation for air disinfection. Public Health Rep. 2010;125:15–27. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck SE, Wright HB, Hargy TM, Larason TC, Linden KG. Action spectra for validation of pathogen disinfection in medium-pressure ultraviolet (UV) systems. Water Res. 2015;70:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.028. - DOI - PubMed