Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;22(2):223-244.
doi: 10.1007/s11914-024-00867-1. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

Diagnosing Osteoporosis in Diabetes-A Systematic Review on BMD and Fractures

Affiliations

Diagnosing Osteoporosis in Diabetes-A Systematic Review on BMD and Fractures

Inge Agnete Gerlach Brandt et al. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Recently, the American Diabetes Association updated the 2024 guidelines for Standards of Care in Diabetes and recommend that a T-score of - 2.0 in patients with diabetes should be interpreted as equivalent to - 2.5 in people without diabetes. We aimed to evaluate the most recent findings concerning the bone mineral density (BMD)-derived T-score and risk of fractures related to osteoporosis in subjects with diabetes.

Recent findings: The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is the golden standard for evaluating BMD. The BMD-derived T-score is central to fracture prediction and signifies both diagnosis and treatment for osteoporosis. However, the increased fracture risk in diabetes is not sufficiently explained by the T-score, complicating the identification and management of fracture risk in these patients. Recent findings agree that subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher T-score and higher fracture risk compared with subjects without diabetes. However, the actual number of studies evaluating the direct association of higher fracture risk at higher T-score levels is scant. Some studies support the adjustment based on the 0.5 BMD T-score difference between subjects with T2D and subjects without diabetes. However, further data from longitudinal studies is warranted to validate if the T-score treatment threshold necessitates modification to prevent fractures in subjects with diabetes.

Keywords: Diabetes type 1; Diabetes type 2; Diagnosis; Fractures; Major osteoporotic fracture; Osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
    1. Vestergaard P. Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes - a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:427–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0253-4 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hough FS, Pierroz DD, Cooper C, Ferrari SL. Mechanisms and evaluation of bone fragility in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174:R127–38. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-15-0820 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah VN, Harrall KK, Shah CS, et al. Bone mineral density at femoral neck and lumbar spine in adults with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28:2601–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4097-x . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC, et al. Association of BMD and FRAX score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Jama. 2011;305:2184–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.715 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Eastell R, Vittinghoff E, Lui L-Y, et al (2022) Diabetes mellitus and the benefit of antiresorptive therapy on fracture risk. Bone Rep 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101190

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources