Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-159)

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Genetically modified maize DP202216 was developed to confer tolerance to glufosinate-ammonium-containing herbicides and to provide an opportunity for yield enhancement under field conditions. These properties were achieved by introducing the mo-pat and zmm28 expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DP202216 and its comparator needs further assessment, except for the levels of stearic acid (C18:0), which do not raise nutritional and safety concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the PAT and ZMM28 proteins as expressed in maize DP202216, and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of maize DP202216. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DP202216 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP202216 is as safe as the comparator and non-GM reference varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize DP202216 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP202216. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP202216 is as safe as its comparator and the tested non-GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Keywords: DP202216; GM; PAT; ZMM28; genetic engineering; import and processing; maize (Zea mays).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

If you wish to access the declaration of interests of any expert contributing to an EFSA scientific assessment, please contact interestmanagement@efsa.europa.eu.

Similar articles

References

    1. Anderson, J. , Brustkern, S. , Cong, B. , Deege, L. , Delaney, B. , Hong, B. , Lawit, S. , Mathesius, C. , Schmidt, J. , Wu, J. , Zhang, J. , & Zimmermann, C. (2019). Evaluation of the history of safe use of the maize ZMM28 protein. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 67, 7466–7474. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00391 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breiteneder, H. , & Mills, E. N. (2005). Molecular properties of food allergens. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 115, 14–23. - PubMed
    1. Castelán‐Muñoz, N. , Herrera, J. , Cajero‐Sánchez, W. , Arrizubieta, M. , Trejo, C. , García‐Ponce, B. , Sánchez, M. P. , Álvarez‐Buylla, E. R. , & Garay‐Arroyo, A. (2019). MADS‐box genes are key components of genetic regulatory networks involved in abiotic stress and plastic developmental responses in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10(10), 853. 10.3389/fpls.2019.00853 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Codex Alimentarius . (2009). Foods derived from modern biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Rome. https://www.fao.org/docrep/011/a1554e/a1554e00.htm
    1. Costa, J. , Bavaro, M. L. , Benede, S. , Diaz‐Perales, A. , Bueno, D. C. , Gelencser, E. , Kluber, J. , Larre, C. , Lozano‐Ojalvo, D. , Lupi, R. , Mafra, I. , Mazzucchelli, G. , Molina, E. , Monaci, L. , Marton, P. L. , Piras, C. , Rodrigues, P. M. , Roncada, P. , Schrama, D. , … Holzhauser, T. (2022). Are physicochemical properties shaping the allergenic potency of plant allergens? Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 62(1), 37–63. 10.1007/s12016-020-08810-9 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources