Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 14;34(1):57-69.
doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01908-7. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Collaborative Assessment in the Gross Anatomy Lab

Affiliations

Collaborative Assessment in the Gross Anatomy Lab

Ryan Maureen Tubbs et al. Med Sci Educ. .

Abstract

Purpose: In 2018, the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine incorporated two-stage examinations into the gross anatomy curriculum. Multiple studies have investigated two-stage examinations and have largely reported positive findings. Here, we used a mixed-methods approach to further investigate the feasibility and student perceptions of the two-stage examination in the context of a medical school curriculum that emphasizes longitudinal group-based learning and formative assessments.

Methods: Three student cohorts were assessed with a formative two-stage examination at the end of their first-year anatomy experience. Data for the quantitative analysis included examination scores from the individual and group portions of the two-stage examination. For the qualitative stage of this project, we utilized a constructivist grounded theory methodology in which data, including both post-examination survey results and one-on-one semi-structured student interviews, were transcribed (interviews), coded, inductively and iteratively reviewed, and thematically interpreted.

Results: Survey and interview results revealed an overwhelmingly positive perception of the collaborative assessment experience. Student comments demonstrated educational value in the immediate feedback provided by this examination format and suggested that collaboration during the examination transformed the assessment into a learning experience.

Conclusions: While two-stage examinations have the potential to positively transform an assessment into a learning experience, we also identified complex relationships between content knowledge and anxiety that may affect student perceptions. In addition, examination logistics (e.g., curricular timing) have the potential to negatively affect student perceptions, indicating that faculty should consider these factors when implementing collaborative assessments into their curriculum.

Keywords: Formative; Group testing; Mixed-methods; Two-stage examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing InterestsThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of organization of MSU CHM students
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examination results by matriculation year
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Likert scale survey results
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Grounded theory analysis

Similar articles

References

    1. Rotellar C, Cain J. Research, perspectives, and recommendations on implementing the flipped classroom. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016;80(2):Article 34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hopkins R, Regehr G, Wilson TD. Exploring the changing learning environment of the gross anatomy lab. Acad Med. 2011;86(7):883–888. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821de30f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bertman SL, Marks SC., Jr The dissection experience as a laboratory for self-discovery about death and dying: another side of clinical anatomy. Clin Anat. 1989;2(2):103–113. doi: 10.1002/ca.980020207. - DOI
    1. Bentley BS, Hill RV. Objective and subjective assessment of reciprocal peer teaching in medical gross anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(4):143–149. doi: 10.1002/ase.96. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evans DJ, Cuffe T. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(5):227–233. doi: 10.1002/ase.110. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources