Collaborative Assessment in the Gross Anatomy Lab
- PMID: 38510406
- PMCID: PMC10948708
- DOI: 10.1007/s40670-023-01908-7
Collaborative Assessment in the Gross Anatomy Lab
Abstract
Purpose: In 2018, the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine incorporated two-stage examinations into the gross anatomy curriculum. Multiple studies have investigated two-stage examinations and have largely reported positive findings. Here, we used a mixed-methods approach to further investigate the feasibility and student perceptions of the two-stage examination in the context of a medical school curriculum that emphasizes longitudinal group-based learning and formative assessments.
Methods: Three student cohorts were assessed with a formative two-stage examination at the end of their first-year anatomy experience. Data for the quantitative analysis included examination scores from the individual and group portions of the two-stage examination. For the qualitative stage of this project, we utilized a constructivist grounded theory methodology in which data, including both post-examination survey results and one-on-one semi-structured student interviews, were transcribed (interviews), coded, inductively and iteratively reviewed, and thematically interpreted.
Results: Survey and interview results revealed an overwhelmingly positive perception of the collaborative assessment experience. Student comments demonstrated educational value in the immediate feedback provided by this examination format and suggested that collaboration during the examination transformed the assessment into a learning experience.
Conclusions: While two-stage examinations have the potential to positively transform an assessment into a learning experience, we also identified complex relationships between content knowledge and anxiety that may affect student perceptions. In addition, examination logistics (e.g., curricular timing) have the potential to negatively affect student perceptions, indicating that faculty should consider these factors when implementing collaborative assessments into their curriculum.
Keywords: Formative; Group testing; Mixed-methods; Two-stage examination.
© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to International Association of Medical Science Educators 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing InterestsThe authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A multi-year evaluation of medical student performance on and perceptions of collaborative gross anatomy laboratory examinations.Anat Sci Educ. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):557-566. doi: 10.1002/ase.2223. Epub 2022 Sep 23. Anat Sci Educ. 2023. PMID: 36102481
-
Two-stage collaborative group testing does not improve retention of anatomy among students studying medical radiation technology.J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021 Dec;52(4S):S96-S109. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Sep 25. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021. PMID: 34583909
-
Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Sep;13(5):581-590. doi: 10.1002/ase.1931. Epub 2019 Dec 12. Anat Sci Educ. 2020. PMID: 31733172
-
Motivating student learning using a formative assessment journey.J Anat. 2014 Mar;224(3):296-303. doi: 10.1111/joa.12117. Epub 2013 Sep 30. J Anat. 2014. PMID: 24111930 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Curricular and pedagogical aspects of gross anatomy education for undergraduate physiotherapy students: a scoping review.JBI Evid Synth. 2020 May;18(5):893-951. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003903. JBI Evid Synth. 2020. PMID: 32813351
References
-
- Bertman SL, Marks SC., Jr The dissection experience as a laboratory for self-discovery about death and dying: another side of clinical anatomy. Clin Anat. 1989;2(2):103–113. doi: 10.1002/ca.980020207. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous