Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 15;39(5):457-468.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae019.

Why does a public health issue (not) get priority? Agenda setting for the national burns programme in India

Vikash Ranjan Keshri  1   2 , Jagnoor Jagnoor  1   2 , Margie Peden  3   4   5 , Robyn Norton  2   5 , Seye Abimbola  6
Affiliations

Why does a public health issue (not) get priority? Agenda setting for the national burns programme in India

Vikash Ranjan Keshri et al. Health Policy Plan. .

Abstract

There is growing scholarly interest in what leads to global or national prioritization of specific health issues. By retrospectively analysing agenda setting for India's national burn programme, this study aimed to better understand how the agenda-setting process influenced its design, implementation and performance. We conducted document reviews and key informant interviews with stakeholders and used a combination of analytical frameworks on policy prioritization and issue framing for analysis. The READ (readying material, extracting data, analysing data and distilling findings) approach was used for document reviews, and qualitative thematic analysis was used for coding and analysis of documents and interviews. The findings suggest three critical features of burns care policy prioritization in India: challenges of issue characteristics, divergent portrayal of ideas and its framing as a social and/or health issue and over-centralization of agenda setting. First, lack of credible indicators on the magnitude of the problem and evidence on interventions limited issue framing, advocacy and agenda setting. Second, the policy response to burns has two dimensions in India: response to gender-based intentional injuries and the healthcare response. While intentional burns have received policy attention, the healthcare response was limited until the national programme was initiated in 2010 and scaled up in 2014. Third, over-centralization of agenda setting (dominated by a few homogenous actors, located in the national capital, with attention focused on the national ministry of health) contributed to limitations in programme design and implementation. We note following elements to consider when analysing issues of significant burden but limited priority: the need to analyse how actors influence issue framing, the particularities of issues, the inadequacy of any one dominant frame and the limited intersection of frames. Based on this analysis in India, we recommend a decentralized approach to agenda setting and for the design and implementation of national programmes from the outset.

Keywords: Health policy; India; agenda setting; burns; decentralization; governance; injury; policy analysis; policy process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The analytical framework
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Timeline of the emergence of burn care issue and national programme development
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Abiiro GA, Alatinga KA, Yamey G. 2021. Why did Ghana’s national health insurance capitation payment model fall off the policy agenda? A regional level policy analysis. Health Policy & Planning 36: 869–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abimbola S, Negin J, Jan S, Martiniuk A. 2014. Towards people-centred health systems: a multi-level framework for analysing primary health care governance in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy & Planning 29: ii29–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abimbola S, Olanipekun T, Igbokwe U et al. 2015. How decentralisation influences the retention of primary health care workers in rural Nigeria. Global Health Action 8: 26616. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahuja R. 1995. Managing burns in India—focussing on newer strategies. Indian Journal of Burns 3: 1–7.
    1. Bardach E. 2019. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd.