Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 21:33:e16.
doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000210.

Mental health and help-seeking in Czech sexual minorities: a nationally representative cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Mental health and help-seeking in Czech sexual minorities: a nationally representative cross-sectional study

Michal Pitoňák et al. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. .

Abstract

Aims: The mental health of sexual minority (SM) individuals remains overlooked and understudied in Czechia. We aimed to estimate (1) the prevalence rate and (2) the relative risk of common mental disorders and (3) the mental distress severity among the Czech SM people compared with the heterosexual population. In addition, we aimed to investigate help-seeking for mental disorders in SM people.

Methods: We used data from a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of Czech community-dwelling adults, consisting of 3063 respondents (response rate = 58.62%). We used the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview to assess the presence of mental disorders. In individuals scoring positively, we established help-seeking in the past 12 months. We assessed symptom severity using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. We computed the prevalence of mental disorders and the treatment gap with 95% confidence intervals. To assess the risk of having a mental disorder, we used binary logistic regression.

Results: We demonstrated that the prevalence of current mental disorders was 18.85% (17.43-20.28), 52.27% (36.91-67.63), 33.33% (19.5-47.17) and 25.93% (13.85-38) in heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. Suicidal thoughts and behaviours were present in 5.73% (4.88-6.57), 25.00% (11.68-38.32), 22.92% (10.58-35.25) and 11.11% (2.45-19.77) of heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. After confounder adjustment, gay or lesbian individuals were more likely to have at least one current mental disorder compared with heterosexual counterparts (odds ratio = 3.51; 1.83-6.76). For bisexual and sexually more diverse individuals, the results were consistent with a null effect (1.85; 0.96-3.45 and 0.89; 0.42-1.73). The mean depression symptom severity was 2.96 (2.81-3.11) in heterosexual people and 4.68 (2.95-6.42), 7.12 (5.07-9.18) and 5.17 (3.38-6.95) in gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. The mean anxiety symptom severity was 1.97 (1.85-2.08) in heterosexual people and 3.5 (1.98-5.02), 4.63 (3.05-6.2) and 3.7 (2.29-5.11) in gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. We demonstrated broadly consistent levels of treatment gap in heterosexual and SM individuals scoring positively for at least one current mental disorder (82.91%; 79.5-85.96 vs. 81.13%; 68.03-90.56).

Conclusions: We provide evidence that SM people in Czechia have substantially worse mental health outcomes than their heterosexual counterparts. Systemic changes are imperative to provide not only better and more sensitive care to SM individuals but also to address structural stigma contributing to these health disparities.

Keywords: mental disorders; population survey; prevalence rate; probability sample; sexual minority; sexual orientation; suicidality; treatment gap.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Prevalence of mental disorders per M.I.N.I.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Relative risk of mental disorder occurrence per M.I.N.I.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Linear regression models of mental distress severity per PHQ-9 and GAD-7

Similar articles

References

    1. Badgett ML, Baker K, Conron K, Gates G, Gill A, Greytak E and Herman J (2014) Best practices for asking questions to identify transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys (GenIUSS). The GenIUSS Group, UCLA Williams Institute.
    1. Barnett AP, Molock SD, Nieves-Lugo K and Zea MC (2019) Anti-LGBT victimization, fear of violence at school, and suicide risk among adolescents. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity 6(1), 88–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bränström R, Fellman D and Pachankis J (2022) Structural stigma and sexual minority victimization across 28 countries: The moderating role of gender, gender nonconformity, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 38(3–4), 3563–3585. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bränström R, van der Star A and Pachankis J (2019) European-wide monitoring of sexual and gender minority health: A necessary and feasible task for advancing health equity. The European Journal of Public Health 29, 199–200. - PubMed
    1. Brooks VR (1981) Minority Stress and Lesbian Women. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.