Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 May 1;10(5):621-633.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0057.

Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mark Sorin et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: To date, no meta-analyses have comprehensively assessed the association of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized and nonrandomized settings. In addition, there exists controversy concerning the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with NSCLC with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels less than 1%.

Objective: To compare neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with chemotherapy by adverse events and surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes using recently published randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized trials.

Data sources: MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched from January 1, 2013, to October 25, 2023, for all clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy that included at least 10 patients.

Study selection: Observational studies and trials reporting the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, including chemoradiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, or immunotherapy monotherapy, were excluded.

Main outcomes and measures: Surgical, pathological, and efficacy end points and adverse events were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis.

Results: Among 43 eligible trials comprising 5431 patients (4020 males [74.0%]; median age range, 55-70 years), there were 8 randomized clinical trials with 3387 patients. For randomized clinical trials, pooled overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; I2 = 0%), event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.67; I2 = 14.9%), major pathological response (risk ratio, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.83-4.15; I2 = 31.2%), and complete pathological response (risk ratio, 5.52; 95% CI, 4.25-7.15; I2 = 27.4%) favored neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy over neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with baseline tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1%, there was a significant benefit in event-free survival for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion and relevance: This study found that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy across surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes. These findings suggest that patients with resectable NSCLC with tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1% may have an event-free survival benefit with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Fiset reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), EMD Serono, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Precision Rx-Dx and grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr Sepesi reported receiving personal fees from BMS, AstraZeneca, PeerView, and Medscape outside the submitted work. Dr Forde reported receiving grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Biontech, Novartis Biontech, and Regeneron and personal fees from Ascendis, AstraZeneca, BMS, Curevac, Novartis, Regeneron, G1, Genelux, Genentech, Gritstone, Merck, Janssen, F Star, Sanofi, Amgen, Fosun, Teva, Synthekine, Flame, Iteos, Tavotek, and Teva during the conduct of the study. Dr Cascone reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Clinical Care Options, IDEOlogy Health, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, the Mark Foundation for Cancer Research, Roche, Medscape, OncLive, PeerView, Physicians' Education Resource, Genentech, Merck, Pfizer, Regeneron, Dava Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and grants from AstraZeneca and BMS outside the submitted work. Dr Provencio reported receiving grants from BMS, MSD, Amgen, and Takeda and personal fees from Roche and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. Dr Spicer reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, BMS, Roche, Amgen, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Xenetic Biosciences, Regeneron, and Eisai and grants from AstraZeneca, Merck, BMS, Roche, Protalix Biotherapeutics, and Regeneron during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Overall Survival Across Randomized Clinical Trials
Pooled HRs comparing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are given for all patients, by programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, and for patients with stage III disease. For Wakelee et al, Spicer et al, and Spicer et al, PD-L1 levels of 1% or greater and stage III were each split into 2 groups. Chemo-IO indicates chemoimmunotherapy. a PD-L1 group: 1% to 49%. b PD-L1 group 50% or greater. cStage IIIA. dStage IIIB.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Event-Free Survival Across Randomized Clinical Trials
Pooled HRs comparing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are given for all patients, by stage, and by programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) level. Additional references include Forde et al, Provencio Pulla et al, and Provencio Pulla et al for Forde et al; Spicer et al and Spicer et al for Wakelee et al; Lu et al for Lu et al ; and Cascone et al for Cascone et al. For Forde et al, 97.38% CIs were reported for overall event-free survival. For Heymach et al, a stratified HR was reported for overall event-free-survival. For Wakelee et al and Heymach et al, stage III was split into 2 groups. For Provencio, progression-free survival was used instead of event-free survival. Chemo-IO indicates chemoimmunotherapy. aStage IIIA. bStage IIIB.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Pooled Risk Ratios (RRs) for Pathological Outcomes Across Randomized Clinical Trials
Pooled RRs comparing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are given for major pathological response (MPR) and complete pathological response (pCR). Chemo-IO indicates chemoimmunotherapy.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Pooled Risk Ratios (RRs) for Surgical Outcomes Across Randomized Clinical Trials
Pooled RRs comparing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are given for surgical resection (A) and R0 resection (B). Chemo-IO indicates chemoimmunotherapy.

Comment in

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duma N, Santana-Davila R, Molina JR. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(8):1623-1640. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelsey CR, Marks LB, Hollis D, et al. . Local recurrence after surgery for early stage lung cancer: an 11-year experience with 975 patients. Cancer. 2009;115(22):5218-5227. doi:10.1002/cncr.24625 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Endo C, Sakurada A, Notsuda H, et al. . Results of long-term follow-up of patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(4):1061-1068. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gourcerol D, Scherpereel A, Debeugny S, Porte H, Cortot AB, Lafitte JJ. Relevance of an extensive follow-up after surgery for nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(5):1357-1364. doi:10.1183/09031936.00086712 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms