Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 1;106(9):823-830.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00789. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

Implementing a Hospitalist Comanagement Service in Orthopaedic Surgery

Affiliations

Implementing a Hospitalist Comanagement Service in Orthopaedic Surgery

Diane Ghanem et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. .

Abstract

➤ Hospitalist comanagement of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery is a growing trend across the United States, yet its implementation in an academic tertiary care hospital can be complex and even contentious.➤ Hospitalist comanagement services lead to better identification of at-risk patients, optimization of patient care to prevent adverse events, and streamlining of the admission process, thereby enhancing the overall service efficiency.➤ A successful hospitalist comanagement service includes the identification of service stakeholders and leaders; frequent consensus meetings; a well-defined standardized framework, with goals, program metrics, and unified commands; and an occasional satisfaction assessment to update and improve the program.➤ In this article, we establish a step-by-step protocol for the implementation of a comanagement structure between orthopaedic and hospitalist services at a tertiary care center, outlining specific protocols and workflows for patient care and transfer procedures among various departments, particularly in emergency and postoperative situations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H946 ).

References

    1. Chang LL, Devereaux PJ, Slobogean G. Choice of admitting services for older adults with hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 29;387(26):2466-8.
    1. Grigoryan KV, Javedan H, Rudolph JL. Orthogeriatric care models and outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Mar;28(3):e49-55.
    1. Kammerlander C, Roth T, Friedman SM, Suhm N, Luger TJ, Kammerlander-Knauer U, Krappinger D, Blauth M. Ortho-geriatric service—a literature review comparing different models. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Dec;21(Suppl 4):S637-46.
    1. Roll C, Tittel S, Schäfer M, Burkhardt J, Kinner B. Continuous improvement process: ortho-geriatric co-management of proximal femoral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Mar;139(3):347-54.
    1. Suhm N, Kaelin R, Studer P, Wang Q, Kressig RW, Rikli D, Jakob M, Pretto M. Orthogeriatric care pathway: a prospective survey of impact on length of stay, mortality and institutionalisation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Sep;134(9):1261-9.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources