Factors Associated With Onabotulinum Toxin-A Discontinuation in a Diverse Urban Population
- PMID: 38517278
- DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001484
Factors Associated With Onabotulinum Toxin-A Discontinuation in a Diverse Urban Population
Abstract
Importance: Although overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition, affecting 16% of Americans, few patients continue on to advanced therapies. Furthermore, procedural therapies like intravesical onabotulinum toxin-A (BTX-A), which require ongoing repeat treatments, have discontinuation rates ranging from 25% to 51%.
Objectives: This study sought to investigate factors associated with dis-continuation of BTX-A injections for idiopathic OAB among a diverse urban population.
Study design: This was a retrospective review of adults 18 years and older who underwent BTX-A injection for idiopathic OAB. Patient demographics, past medical history, symptoms, and postprocedural outcomes such as subjective improvement, urinary retention, and incidence of urinary tract infection were compared between groups.
Results: Onabotulinum toxin-A injections were administered to 246 patients who met study criteria, of whom 211 (85.7%) were women. One hundred (40.7%) patients discontinued BTX-A therapy. Patients discontinuing BTX-A therapy were more likely to have developed postprocedural urinary retention (18.4% vs 9.7%, P < 0.05) and had a higher median income by zip code ($59,000 vs $50,000; P < 0.01). Patients were significantly more likely to continue BTX-A therapy if they reported preprocedural nocturia (57.2% vs 36.8%, P < 0.01) or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (78.1% vs 64.6%, P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Adverse outcomes, such as postprocedural urinary retention, are associated with discontinuation of BTX-A therapy. Patients who reported nocturia and UUI before injection were more likely to continue BTX-A suggesting more severe OAB is more responsive to this therapy. Given the large proportion (>40%) of patients who discontinued BTX-A treatment, further research is needed to identify barriers to continuation of care.
Copyright © 2024 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Eapen RS, Radomski SB. Review of the epidemiology of overactive bladder. Res Rep Urol . 2016;8:71–76. doi:10.2147/RRU.S102441. - DOI
-
- Milsom I, Kaplan SA, Coyne KS, et al. Effect of bothersome overactive bladder symptoms on health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, and treatment seeking in the United States: results from EpiLUTS. Urology . 2012;80(1):90–96. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.004. - DOI
-
- Hutchinson A, Nesbitt A, Joshi A, et al. Overactive bladder syndrome: management and treatment options. Aust J Gen Pract . 2020;49(9):593–598. doi:10.31128/AJGP-11-19-5142. - DOI
-
- Orasanu B, Mahajan ST. The use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Indian J Urol . 2013;29(1):2–11. doi:10.4103/0970-1591.109975. - DOI
-
- Lagueny A, Burbaud P. Mechanism of action, clinical indication and results of treatment of botulinum toxin. Neurophysiol Clin . 1996;26(4):216–226. doi:10.1016/s0987-7053(96)85003-9. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous