Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 22;4(1):56.
doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00456-4.

A phase IIb randomized placebo-controlled trial testing the effect of MAG-EPA long-chain omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplement on prostate cancer proliferation

Affiliations

A phase IIb randomized placebo-controlled trial testing the effect of MAG-EPA long-chain omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplement on prostate cancer proliferation

Karine Robitaille et al. Commun Med (Lond). .

Abstract

Background: High prostate eicosapentaenoic fatty acid (EPA) levels were associated with a significant reduction of upgrading to grade group (GG) ≥ 2 prostate cancer in men under active surveillance. We aimed to evaluate the effect of MAG-EPA long-chain omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplement on prostate cancer proliferation.

Methods: A phase II double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 130 men diagnosed with GG ≥ 2 prostate cancer and undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2015-2017 (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02333435). Participants were randomized to receive 3 g daily of either MAG-EPA (n = 65) or placebo (n = 65) for 7 weeks (range 4-10) prior to radical prostatectomy. The primary outcome was the cancer proliferation index quantified by automated image analysis of tumor nuclear Ki-67 expression using standardized prostatectomy tissue microarrays. Additional planned outcomes at surgery are reported including plasma levels of 27 inflammatory cytokines and fatty acid profiles in circulating red blood cells membranes and prostate tissue.

Results: Cancer proliferation index measured by Ki-67 expression was not statistically different between the intervention (3.10%) and placebo (2.85%) groups (p = 0.64). In the per protocol analyses, the adjusted estimated effect of MAG-EPA was greater but remained non-significant. Secondary outcome was the changes in plasma levels of 27 cytokines, of which only IL-7 was higher in MAG-EPA group compared to placebo (p = 0.026). Men randomized to MAG-EPA prior to surgery had four-fold higher EPA levels in prostate tissue compared to those on placebo.

Conclusions: This MAG-EPA intervention did not affect the primary outcome of prostate cancer proliferation according to nuclear Ki-67 expression. More studies are needed to decipher the effects of long-chain omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplementation in men with prostate cancer.

Plain language summary

It is thought that our diet can impact our risk of cancer and affect outcomes in patients with cancer. Omega-3 fatty acids, mostly found in fatty fish, might be beneficial by protecting against prostate cancer and its adverse outcomes. We conducted a clinical trial to test the effects of an omega-3 dietary supplement (MAG-EPA) in men with prostate cancer. We randomly allocated 130 men to receive either MAG-EPA or a placebo for 7 weeks before their prostate cancer surgery. We measured a marker of how much tumor cells were proliferating (or growing in number) at the point of surgery, which might indicate how aggressive their disease was. However, the supplement did not affect tumor cell proliferation. The supplement was therefore not beneficial in this group of patients and further studies are needed to test and confirm the effects of MAG-EPA on prostate cancer cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests. The study funders had no role on study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; manuscript writing and decision to submit it for publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. CONSORT trial flow diagram.
RCT-EPA study flow chart for the primary endpoint (n = 121). For systemic inflammation (secondary endpoint), all randomized men have been included (n = 130). For adherence to intervention and adverse events, all men who underwent radical prostatectomy have been included (n = 128). MAG-EPA eicosapentaenoic acid monoacylglyceride, FFPE Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded, TMA Tissue Microarray.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Effects of MAG-EPA on interleukin-7 (IL-7) cytokine level in enrolled men.
Difference of IL-7 level (pg/mL) after 7 weeks of intervention and study baseline. Baseline: n = 130; RP: n = 126 (2 patients in placebo group did not have blood collection at RP, 2 patients in MAG-EPA dropped out before surgery). Gray bars are the mean ± SEM. P-value from Fligner-Policello test between placebo and MAG-EPA groups. RP radical prostatectomy, MAG monoacylglyceride, EPA eicosapentaenoic acid.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Effects of MAG-EPA on fatty acid profiles in enrolled men.
a Fatty acid levels of red blood cell (RBC) membranes (% of total fatty acid content). Baseline: n = 121; RP: n = 118 (2 patients did not have blood collection at RP, 1 patient withdrew consent for additional research). Left: relative level of EPA, and Right: ω6:ω3 ratio. b Fatty acid levels in prostate tissue, n = 117 (3 patients did not have tissue collected for research, 1 patient withdrew consent for additional research). Left: relative EPA level (% of fatty acid content), Middle: absolute EPA level (mg of fatty acids per gram of tissue), and Right: ω6:ω3 ratio. c DHA level of RBC membranes (% of total fatty acid content, left) and of prostate tissue at RP (mg of DHA per g of tissue, right). Error bars are ± SEM. ****p < 0.0001, student T-test between placebo and MAG-EPA group, unpaired, two-tailed. ω3 omega-3 fatty acids, ω6 omge-6 fatty acids, RP radical prostatectomy, MAG-EPA eicosapentaenoic acid monoacylglyceride, Q quartile. FA fatty acids.

References

    1. Movember. https://ca.movember.com/mens-health/prostate-cancer (2022).
    1. Gordon LG, et al. Estimating the healthcare costs of treating prostate cancer in Australia: a markov modelling analysis. Urol. Oncol. 2018;36:91.e97–91.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grover SA, et al. The economic burden of prostate cancer in Canada: forecasts from the montreal prostate cancer model. CMAJ. 2000;162:987–992. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballon-Landa E, Parsons JK. Nutrition, physical activity and lifestyle factors in prostate cancer prevention. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2018;28:55–61. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000460. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin PH, Aronson W, Freedland SJ. Nutrition, dietary interventions and prostate cancer: the latest evidence. BMC. Med. 2015;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0234-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data