Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;31(5):2305-2312.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02494-4. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

Quantifying resource sharing in working memory

Affiliations

Quantifying resource sharing in working memory

Julie Pougeon et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Several models of working memory (WM), the cognitive system devoted to the temporary maintenance of a small amount of information in view of its treatment, assume that these two functions of storage and processing share a common and limited resource. However, the predictions issued from these models concerning this resource-sharing remain usually qualitative, and at which precise extent these functions are affected by their concurrent implementation remains undecided. The aim of the present study was to quantify this resource sharing by expressing storage and processing performance during a complex span task in terms of the proportion of the highest level of performance each participant was able to reach (i.e., their span) in each component when performed in isolation. Two experiments demonstrated that, despite substantial dual-task decrements, participants managed to preserve half or more of their best performance in both components, testifying for a remarkable robustness of the human cognitive system. The implications of these results for the main WM models are discussed.

Keywords: Dual-task performance; Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of the single memorization of letters task (a), single parity judgment task (b), and the dual task (c) in both experiments. The participants were instructed to fixate on the circle and diamond placeholders during the single tasks
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of participants as a function of their processing and storage scores in percentage of their span performance for Experiment 1 (blue dots) and Experiment 2 (red dots). The black diagonal corresponds to a sum of 100. The dotted diagonal materializes what would be the equality between the two scores. (Color figure online)

References

    1. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Clarendon Press.
    1. Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.
    1. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (8th ed., pp. 647–667). Academic Press.
    1. Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple-component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–61). Cambridge University Press.
    1. Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. (2021). A multicomponent model of working memory. In R. H. Logie, V. Camos, & N. Cowan (Eds.), Working memory: State of the science (pp. 10–43). Oxford University Press.

LinkOut - more resources