Examining Youth Flexible ACT Model Implementation in the Netherlands
- PMID: 38519800
- PMCID: PMC11199218
- DOI: 10.1007/s10597-024-01260-z
Examining Youth Flexible ACT Model Implementation in the Netherlands
Abstract
Model adherence is a key indicator of mental health care quality. This study investigates the degree of model adherence, as well as content and staging of care, among the first Youth Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams in the Netherlands. Model fidelity was assessed in sixteen teams with the Youth Flexile ACT model fidelity scale (2014 version). Mental health workers completed a 'content of care questionnaire' to map the interventions applied in the teams. Model fidelity scores revealed that twelve teams adhered to the Youth Flexible ACT standard with 'optimal implementation' (≥ 4.1 on a 5 point scale) and four teams with 'adequate implementation'. Most disciplines were well integrated within the teams; however, several items regarding the involvement of specific disciplines and the availability of treatment interventions (peer support worker, employment and education specialist and programs, family interventions, integrated dual disorder treatment) scored below the optimum. Frequency of contact during ACT and the use of Routine Outcome Monitoring instruments scored below the optimum as well. The 'content of care' data showed that most clients received an individual psychological intervention, and nearly half of the client sample received scaled-up / intensified ACT care. The findings indicate a predominantly successful translation of care from the theoretical Flexible ACT framework into practice, covering both ACT and non-ACT functions. Further room for improvement lies in the incorporation of specialized disciplines in the personal and social recovery domains, including the peer support worker and employment and education specialist, as well as in specific protocolled interventions.
Keywords: Adolescent Mental Health; Flexible Assertive Community Treatment; Integrated Care Approach; Model fidelity.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Prof. Dr. Kroon is a board member of the Centre for Certification ACT and Flexible ACT (CCAF) and a board member of FACT Netherlands. Dr. Maaike van Vugt is an advisor for the CCAF and a member of the CCAF Quality Committee. The CCAF executes peer audits using model fidelity scales to ensure the quality of ACT and Flexible ACT. Dr. Frieswijk chairs the national platform Youth Flexible ACT and is a member of the board of FACT Netherlands. MSc. Broersen, Dr. Creemers, and Dr. Vermulst receive a salary from GGZ Oost Brabant. All opinions presented in this manuscript belong to the authors alone. The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Anderson JL, Howarth E, Vainre M, Jones PB, Humphrey A. A scoping literature review of service-level barriers for access and engagement with mental health services for children and young people. Children and Youth Services Review. 2017;77:164–176. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.04.017. - DOI
-
- Borah E, Cohen D, Bearman SK, Platz M, Londoño T. Comparison of child and adult clinicians’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to effective care transition. Social Work in Mental Health. 2021;19(2):166–185. doi: 10.1080/15332985.2021.1894629. - DOI
-
- Broersen M, Creemers DHM, Frieswijk N, Vermulst AA, Kroon H. Investigating the critical elements and psychosocial outcomes of Youth Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: A study protocol for an observational prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal Open. 2020;10(4):e035146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035146. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical