Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):214.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06420-3.

Association of maternal nutritional status and small for gestational age neonates in peri-urban communities of Karachi, Pakistan: findings from the PRISMA study

Sobia Ambreen  1 , Nida Yazdani  2 , Abdul Salam Alvi  3 , Muhammad Farrukh Qazi  2 , Zahra Hoodbhoy  4
Affiliations

Association of maternal nutritional status and small for gestational age neonates in peri-urban communities of Karachi, Pakistan: findings from the PRISMA study

Sobia Ambreen et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Early pregnancy nutritional status can be associated with adverse birth outcomes such as small-for-gestational age (SGA) and low birth weight (LBW). BMI (Body Mass Index) and MUAC (Mid-upper arm circumference) are easy to use assessments and are indicative of the pre-pregnancy nutritional status if obtained in the first trimester. This study primarily assesses the association of maternal nutritional status using BMI and MUAC with SGA in a community-based cohort of Pakistani women. It also aims to determine the predictive ability of MUAC and BMI in predicting SGA. Secondarily, we assessed the association between maternal nutrition and large for gestational age (LGA) and LBW.

Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of an ongoing pregnancy cohort "Pregnancy Risk Infant Surveillance and Measurement Alliance (PRISMA)"in Ibrahim Hyderi and Rehri Goth, Karachi. PRISMA participants who were enrolled between January 2021 to August 2022 were included given they had a gestational age < 14 weeks confirmed via ultrasound, MUAC and BMI measurements were available and birth weight was captured within 72 hours. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine an association between maternal nutritional status and SGA. The PRISMA study was approved by the Aga Khan University Ethics Review Committee (2021-5920-15,518).

Results: Of 926 women included in the analysis, 26.6% (n = 247) had a low MUAC (< 23 cm) while 18.4% (n = 171) were underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2). Nearly one third of low MUAC and underweight women delivered SGA infants (34.4 and 35.1% respectively). Underweight women and women with low MUAC had a statistically significant association with SGA (Underweight: OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.1,2.4; Low MUAC-OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.2,2.3) as well as LBW (Underweight: OR-1.63, 95% CI 1.1,2.4; Low MUAC-OR-1.63, 95% CI 1.2,2.3). ROC curves showed that MUAC and BMI had modest predictability for SGA (AUC < 0.7).

Conclusion: Maternal nutritional status as indicated by BMI and MUAC are strongly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including SGA, LGA and LBW. Although MUAC and BMI are widely used to determine maternal nutritional status, they have poor predictive ability for newborn size. Further research is needed to identify other tools or a combination of tools to better predict adverse birth outcomes in resource-limited settings and plan interventions.

Keywords: Body mass index; Low birth weight; Maternal nutrition; Mid-upper arm circumference; Small-for-gestational age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of all the participants included in the final analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curves for comparison of MUAC and BMI in predicting SGA
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Han Z, Mulla S, Beyene J, Liao G, SD MD, Group obotKS Maternal underweight and the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;40(1):65–101. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq195. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abu-Saad K, Fraser D. Maternal nutrition and birth outcomes. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32(1):5–25. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxq001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Imdad A, Lassi Z, Salaam R, Bhutta ZA. Chapter 1 - prenatal nutrition and nutrition in pregnancy: effects on long-term growth and development. In: Saavedra JM, Dattilo AM, editors. Early Nutrition and Long-Term Health. Woodhead Publishing; 2017. pp. 3–24.
    1. NRFCJT Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 192 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–1396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30054-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maternal Nutrition Strategy 2022–2027 Pakistan UNICEF Pakistan https://www.unicef.org/pakistan/media/4356/file/Pakistan%20Maternal%20Nu.... Accessed 30 Sept 2023.