Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Mar 22;13(1):93.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02514-3.

Transurethral surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia with detrusor underactivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Transurethral surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia with detrusor underactivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Peilin Zou et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients with detrusor underactivity (DU) remains controversial.

Methods: To summarize relevant evidence, three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched from database inception to May 1, 2023. Transurethral surgical treatment modalities include transurethral prostatectomy (TURP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), and transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP). The efficacy of the transurethral surgical treatment was assessed according to maximal flow rate on uroflowmetry (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), postvoid residual (PVR), quality of life (QoL), voided volume, bladder contractility index (BCI) and maximal detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate (PdetQmax). Pooled mean differences (MDs) were used as summary statistics for comparison. The quality of enrolled studies was evaluated by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were applied to assess possible biases.

Results: In this study, 10 studies with a total of 1142 patients enrolled. In BPH patients with DU, within half a year, significant improvements in Qmax (pooled MD, 4.79; 95% CI, 2.43-7.16; P < 0.05), IPSS(pooled MD, - 14.29; 95%CI, - 16.67-11.90; P < 0.05), QoL (pooled MD, - 1.57; 95% CI, - 2.37-0.78; P < 0.05), voided volume (pooled MD, 62.19; 95% CI, 17.91-106.48; P < 0.05), BCI (pooled MD, 23.59; 95% CI, 8.15-39.04; P < 0.05), and PdetQmax (pooled MD, 28.62; 95% CI, 6.72-50.52; P < 0.05) were observed after surgery. In addition, after more than 1 year, significant improvements were observed in Qmax (pooled MD, 6.75; 95%CI, 4.35-9.15; P < 0.05), IPSS(pooled MD, - 13.76; 95%CI, - 15.17-12.35; P < 0.05), PVR (pooled MD, - 179.78; 95%CI, - 185.12-174.44; P < 0.05), QoL (pooled MD, - 2.61; 95%CI, - 3.12-2.09; P < 0.05), and PdetQmax (pooled MD, 27.94; 95%CI, 11.70-44.19; P < 0.05). Compared with DU patients who did not receive surgery, DU patients who received surgery showed better improvement in PVR (pooled MD, 137.00; 95%CI, 6.90-267.10; P < 0.05) and PdetQmax (pooled MD, - 8.00; 95%CI, - 14.68-1.32; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis results showed that transurethral surgery can improve the symptoms of BPH patients with DU. Surgery also showed advantages over pharmacological treatment for BPH patients with DU.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023415188.

Keywords: Detrusor underactivity; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Transurethral surgical treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for studies included in and excluded from the meta-analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The comparison of each value of DU patients before and after surgery within half a year. A Qmax, maximal flow rate on uroflowmetry. B IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score. C PVR, post-void residual. D QoL, quality of life. E Voided volume. F BCI, bladder contractility index. G PdetQmax, maximal detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The comparison of each value of DU patients before and after surgery for more than a year. A Qmax, maximal flow rate on uroflowmetry. B IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score. C PVR, post-void residual. D QoL, quality of life. E Voided volume. F BCI, bladder contractility index. G PdetQmax, maximal detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The comparison of each value of DU patients undergoing surgery or not with 135.6 months follow-up. A Qmax, maximal flow rate on uroflowmetry. B IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score. C PVR, post-void residual. D QoL, quality of life. E Voided volume. F BCI, bladder contractility index. G PdetQmax, maximal detrusor pressure at a maximal flow rate
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The sensitivity analysis of each value of DU patients before and after surgery within half a year. A Qmax, maximal flow rate on uroflowmetry. B IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score. C PVR, post-void residual. D QoL, quality of life. E BCI, bladder contractility index. F PdetQmax, maximal detrusor pressure at a maximal flow rate
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The sensitivity analysis of each value of DU patients before and after surgery more than a year. A Qmax, maximal flow rate on uroflowmetry. B IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score. C PVR, post-void residual. D QoL, quality of life; E. BCI, bladder contractility index. F PdetQmax, maximal detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The funnel plot of each value of DU patients before and after surgery within half a year. A Qmax, maximal flow rate on uroflowmetry. B IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score. C PVR, post-void residual. D QoL, quality of life. E voided volume. F BCI, bladder contractility index. G PdetQmax, maximal detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The funnel plot of each value of DU patients before and after surgery for more than a year. A Qmax, maximal flow rate on uroflowmetry. B IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score. C PVR, post-void residual. D QoL, quality of life. E Voided volume. F BCI, bladder contractility index. G PdetQmax, maximal detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chapple CR, Wein AJ, Abrams P, Dmochowski RR, Giuliano F, Kaplan SA, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms revisited: a broader clinical perspective. Eur Urol. 2008;54(3):563–569. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.109. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Osman NI, Chapple CR, Abrams P, Dmochowski R, Haab F, Nitti V, et al. Detrusor underactivity and the underactive bladder: a new clinical entity? A review of current terminology, definitions, epidemiology, aetiology, and diagnosis. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):389–398. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langan RC. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Prim Care. 2019;46(2):223–232. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2019.02.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seki N, Yuki K, Takei M, Yamaguchi A, Naito S. Analysis of the prognostic factors for overactive bladder symptoms following surgical treatment in patients with benign prostatic obstruction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(3):197–201. doi: 10.1002/nau.20619. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monoski MA, Gonzalez RR, Sandhu JS, Reddy B, Te AE. Urodynamic predictors of outcomes with photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and preoperative retention. Urology. 2006;68(2):312–317. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.020. - DOI - PubMed