Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 23;14(3):e076000.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076000.

Qualitative investigation of military surgical resuscitation teams: what are the drivers of success of a rapid response team?

Affiliations

Qualitative investigation of military surgical resuscitation teams: what are the drivers of success of a rapid response team?

Matthew J Eckert et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: This qualitative study explores the characteristics of a specialised military medical rapid response team (MRRT), the surgical resuscitation team (SRT). Despite mixed evidence of efficacy, civilian MRRTs are widely employed, with significant variation in structure and function. Recent increased use of these teams to mitigate patient risk in challenging healthcare scenarios, such as global pandemics, mass casualty events and resource-constrained health systems, mandates a reconceptualisation of how civilian MRRTs are created, trained and used. Here, we study the core functions and foundational underpinnings of SRTs and discuss how civilian MRRTs might learn from their military counterparts.

Design: Semistructured interview-based study using Descriptive Qualitative Research methodology and Thematic Analysis.

Setting: Remote audio interviews conducted via Zoom.

Participants: Participants included 15 members of the United States Special Operations Command SRTs, representing all medical specialties of the SRT as well as operational planners.

Results: Adaptability was identified as a core function of SRTs and informed by four foundational underpinnings: mission variability, shared values and principles, interpersonal and organisational trust and highly effective teaming. Our findings provide three important insights for civilian MRRTs: (1) team member roles should not be defined by silos of professional specialisation, (2) trust is a key factor in the teaming process and (3) team principles and values result in and are reinforced by organisational trust.

Conclusion: This study offers the first in-depth investigation of a unique military MRRT. Important insights that may offer benefit to civilian MRRT practices include enabling the breakdown of traditional division of labour, allowing for and promoting deep interpersonal and professional familiarity, and facilitating a cycle of positive reinforcement between teams and organisations. Future investigation of small team limitations, comparability to civilian MRRTs, and the team relationship to the larger organisation are needed to better understand how these teams function in a healthcare system and translate to civilian practice.

Keywords: Adult intensive & critical care; MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Devita MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, et al. . Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Crit Care Med 2006;34:2463–78. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000235743.38172.6E - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones DA, DeVita MA, Bellomo R. Rapid-response teams. N Engl J Med 2011;365:139–46. 10.1056/NEJMra0910926 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Investigators MS. Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The Lancet 2005;365:2091–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66733-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, et al. . Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:18–26. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.424 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fischer CP, Bilimoria KY, Ghaferi AA. Rapid response teams as a patient safety practice for failure to rescue. JAMA 2021;326:179–80. 10.1001/jama.2021.7510 - DOI - PubMed