Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;63(12):1225-1238.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

Racial Bias in School Discipline and Police Contact: Evidence From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Social Development (ABCD-SD) Study

Affiliations

Racial Bias in School Discipline and Police Contact: Evidence From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Social Development (ABCD-SD) Study

Sarah J Brislin et al. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Black youth are disproportionately exposed to school exclusionary discipline. We examined the impact of race on age at the onset of school disciplinary actions and police contact, and the rate of receiving increasingly severe disciplinary actions.

Method: Youth (N = 2,156) and their caregivers participating in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Social Development (ABCD-SD) study reported on the occurrence and timing of disciplinary events and youths' demographics, delinquency, and neighborhood conditions. Experiences of exclusionary discipline were analyzed using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Black youth reported significantly higher rates of almost all disciplinary events compared to White youth. In logistic regression and Cox models, Black youth experienced higher risk for exclusionary discipline and police contact (odds ratios from 2.47 [detention] to 5.16 [sent home]; hazard ratios from 1.36 [detention] to 4.71 [expelled]), even after adjusting for sex, delinquency, neighborhood conditions, and the interaction between race and sex. Black youth who received detention and suspension were at higher risk for additional, more severe school discipline than were White youth.

Conclusion: Consistent with a racial bias in exclusionary discipline practices and policing, Black youth, particularly Black male youth, were at a higher risk for experiencing almost all disciplinary outcomes and at younger ages than White youth, after controlling for delinquency, sex, and neighborhood factors. Compared to White students, school detention and suspension status predicted an accelerated cascade of school discipline outcomes for Black students, suggesting racial disparities in how the severity of school discipline escalates over time.

Plain language summary: This authors of this study used data from 2,156 participants in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Social Development study-a national, longitudinal study of adolescent development-to examine the impact of race and sex on exposure to exclusionary discipline (detention, being sent home, expelled) in early adolescence. The authors found that Black youth experienced higher rates of exclusionary discipline and police contact than White youth, even after controlling for self-reported delinquent behavior, sex at birth, and environmental enrichment. Black youth who received detention and suspension were at higher risk for additional, more severe school discipline over time than were White youth who received detention.

Diversity & inclusion statement: We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list.

Keywords: Black; adolescent; education; police; racism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Dr. Brislin has received funding from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA; U01AA021690). Dr. Clark has received funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA046346). Dr. Hicks has received funding from the National Institute of Mental Health (K18 MH135466) and NIAAA (R01AA025790). These grants did not support this research. Drs. Perkins, Ahonen, McCoy, Boxer, and Jackson and Ms. Choi have reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Cumulative Hazard for Detention (Top Left), Suspension (Top Right), Sent Home From School (Bottom Left), and Stopped by Police (Bottom Right) Items, Stratified by Race and Sex
Note: Cumulative hazards are derived from Cox proportional hazard models in which race, sex, Delinquency score, and Childhood Opportunity Index score predict each exclusionary discipline/police contact outcome.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Cumulative Hazard of Detention on Risk for Suspension (Top) and Risk for Being Sent Home (Bottom), Stratified by Race and Sex (Male Youth Left, Female Youth Right)
Note: Cumulative hazards are derived from Cox proportional hazard models including race, sex, Delinquency score, Childhood Opportunity Index score, timing of detention (never, before age 10, after age 10), and interaction between race and timing.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Structural Determinants of School Discipline: Examining State-Level Racial Bias and Neighborhood Opportunity.
    Thompson EL, Gonzalez MR, Scardamalia KM, Pham AV, Adams AR, Gonzalez A, Rizzo Scarfone GV, Lehman SM, Kaiver CM, Hawes SW, Gonzalez R. Thompson EL, et al. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 20:S0890-8567(25)00015-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.017. Online ahead of print. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 39842631 Free PMC article.
  • Longitudinal analysis of the ABCD® study.
    Hawes SW, Littlefield AK, Lopez DA, Sher KJ, Thompson EL, Gonzalez R, Aguinaldo L, Adams AR, Bayat M, Byrd AL, Castro-de-Araujo LF, Dick A, Heeringa SF, Kaiver CM, Lehman SM, Li L, Linkersdörfer J, Maullin-Sapey TJ, Neale MC, Nichols TE, Perlstein S, Tapert SF, Vize CE, Wagner M, Waller R, Thompson WK. Hawes SW, et al. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Apr;72:101518. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101518. Epub 2025 Feb 8. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 39999579 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Jacobsen WC, Pace GT, Ramirez NG. Punishment and inequality at an early age: exclusionary discipline in elementary school. Social Forces. 2019;97(3):973–998. 10.1093/sf/soz039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Novak A, Krohn M. Collateral consequences of school suspension: examining the ‘knifing off’hypothesis. Am J Crimin Justice. 2021;46:728–747. 10.1007/s12103-020-09579-5 - DOI
    1. Welsh RO, Little S. Caste and control in schools: a systematic review of the pathways, rates and correlates of exclusion due to school discipline. Child Youth Services Rev. 2018;94:315–339. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.09.031 - DOI
    1. Jabbari J, Johnson O Jr. The process of “pushing out”: accumulated disadvantage across school punishment and math achievement trajectories. Youth Society. 2022;54(6):911–934. 10.1177/0044118X211007175 - DOI
    1. Rosenbaum J Educational and criminal justice outcomes 12 years after school suspension. Youth Society. 2020;52(4):515–547. 10.1177/0044118X17752208 - DOI - PMC - PubMed