High-power holmium laser versus thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in patients with glands larger than 80 ml: Results from the Prostate Endoscopic EnucLeation study group
- PMID: 38523902
- PMCID: PMC10960086
- DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.12.001
High-power holmium laser versus thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in patients with glands larger than 80 ml: Results from the Prostate Endoscopic EnucLeation study group
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has gained acceptance as an equitable alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Our primary aim is to compare peri-operative outcomes of EEP using thulium fiber laser (TFL) against high-power holmium laser (HPHL) in hands of experienced surgeons for large prostates (≥80 ml in volume). Secondary outcomes were assess complications within 1 year of follow up.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with TFL or HPHL in 13 centers (January 2019-January 2023). Patients with prostate volume ≥80 ml were included, while those with concomitant prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, and pelvic radiotherapy were excluded.
Results: Of 1,929 included patients, HPHL was utilized in 1,459 and TFL in 470. After propensity score matching (PSM) for baseline characteristics, 247 patients from each group were analyzed. Overall operative time (90 [70, 120] vs. 52.5 [39, 93] min, P < 0.001) and enucleation time (90 [70, 105] vs. 38 [25, 70] min, P < 0.001) were longer in the TFL group, with comparable morcellation time (13 [10, 19.5] vs. 13 [10, 16.5] min, P = 0.914). In terms of postoperative outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day complications such as acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection or sepsis. In the PSM cohort, univariable analyses showed that higher age, lower preoperative Qmax, higher preoperative PVRU, and longer operation time were associated with higher odds of postoperative incontinence, while 2-lobe enucleation had lower odds of incontinence compared to 3-lobe enucleation.
Conclusions: This real-world study reaffirms that HPHL and TFL in large prostates are equally efficacious in terms of 30-day complications. TFL with the en-bloc technique has a shorter operative time which significantly improves short- and medium-term functional outcomes.
Keywords: Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate; Laser therapy; Postoperative complications; Prostatic hyperplasia; Urinary incontinence.
© 2024 The Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Comparison Between Thulium Fiber Laser and High-power Holmium Laser for Anatomic Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis from the REAP Registry.Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jan;10(1):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jul 4. Eur Urol Focus. 2024. PMID: 37414615
-
Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Prospective Study of Mid- and Long-Term Outcomes in 1328 Patients.J Endourol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1231-1236. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0029. Epub 2022 Aug 2. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 35414204
-
En bloc and two-lobe techniques for laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: retrospective comparative analysis of peri- and postoperative outcomes.Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Nov;51(11):1969-1974. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02259-2. Epub 2019 Aug 20. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019. PMID: 31432393
-
Initial experience of endoscopic thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate: Perioperative outcomes and learning curve.Fr J Urol. 2025 Apr;35(3):102867. doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102867. Epub 2025 Feb 6. Fr J Urol. 2025. PMID: 39922314
-
Is Thulium laser enucleation of prostate an alternative to Holmium and TURP surgeries - A systematic review?Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(6):419-426. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20202. Epub 2020 Oct 9. Turk J Urol. 2020. PMID: 33052829 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of surgical outcomes of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using different energies.Ther Adv Urol. 2024 Nov 28;16:17562872241303457. doi: 10.1177/17562872241303457. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2024. PMID: 39619111 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative study of low-power versus high-power holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia.Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 5;40(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04329-7. Lasers Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 39907814 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of energy coagulation in radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis: A narrative review.Investig Clin Urol. 2025 Mar;66(2):97-105. doi: 10.4111/icu.20240288. Investig Clin Urol. 2025. PMID: 40047122 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Gudaru K., Gonzalez Padilla D.A., Castellani D., Tortolero Blanco L., Tanidir Y., Ka Lun L., et al. A global knowledge, attitudes and practices survey on anatomical endoscopic enucleation of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia among urologists. Andrologia. 2020 Sep;52(8) - PubMed
-
- Tricard T., Xia S., Xiao D., Tong Z., Gaillard V., Sun J. Outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for very large-sized benign prostatic hyperplasia (over 150 mL): open simple prostatectomy is dead. World J Urol. 2023 Aug;41(8):2249–2253. - PubMed
-
- Lee M.S., Assmus M.A., Ganesh M., Han J., Helon J., Mai Q., et al. An outcomes comparison between holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, open simple prostatectomy, and robotic simple prostatectomy for large gland benign prostatic hypertrophy. Urology. 2023 Mar;173:180–186. - PubMed
-
- Van der Jeugt J., Umari P., Mottaran A., Ribeiro L., Lambert E., Vollemaere J., et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate vs robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with extremely large prostates ≥200 cc: a comparative analysis. J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):895–902. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous